Krawinkler, H., Seneviratna, G.D.P.K., “Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation”, Engineering Structures, 20(4-6), pp. 452- 464, 1998.
 Bracci, J.M., Kunnath, S.K., and Reinhorn, A.M., “Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation for reinforced concrete structures”. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE; 123(1), pp. 3–10, 1997.
 Chopra, A.K., Goel, R.K., “A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimating seismic demands for buildings: Theory and preliminary evaluation”, PEER Report 2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, 2001.
 Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell. C.A. (2005), “Seismic Performance, Capacity and Reliability of Structures as seen Through Incremental Dynamic Analysis”, Department of Civil and environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Report No.151, August.
 Azimi, H. Galal, KH. and Pekau, O.A. (2009), “Incremental Modified Pushover Analysis”, the Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 18, pp 839–859.
 Smith, B.S. and A. Coull, Tall building structures: analysis and design. 1991.
 Chen, Z., Seismic response of high-rise zipper braced frame structures with outrigger trusses. M.S. Thesis,Department of Civil Engineering at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2012
 Jafari, A., Jalali, A., Assessment of performance based parameters in near fault tall buildings. J. of Applied Sciences, 9(22), 4044-4049, 2009.
 Kunnath, S.K., Gupta, B., “Validity of deformation demand estimates using nonlinear static procedures”, Proceeding of the U.S. Japan Workshop on Performance- Based Engineering for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 2000.
 El-Tawil, S., Vidarsson, E., Mikesell, T., Kunnath, S. K., Inelastic behavior and design of steel panel zones. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(2), 183-193, 1999.
[11 ] Azhdarifar, M., Meshkat-Dini, A., Sarvghad Moghadam, A. Evaluation of seismic response of tall buildings with framed tube skeletons in high seismic areas. 7th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (SEE7), Tehran, Iran (12), 2015.
[12 ] Iranian National Building Code 2014 (Steel Structures – Division 10), Tehran, Iran (In Persion).
 Iranian National Building Code 2014 (Design Loads for Buildings -Division 6), Tehran, Iran (In Persion).
FEMA 356, Federal Emergency Management, 1998
 Iranian Standard No. 2800, 2014 Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, fourth edition, Tehran, Iran (In Persion).
 Krawinkler, H., Earthquake design and performance of steel structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 29, 229-241, 1996.
 PEER, “Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research center strong motion database”, http://peer.berkeley.edu.
 Poursha, M., 2013 An iterative process for pushover analysis of double unsymmetric-plan low-and medium-rise buildings under bi-directional seismic excitations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 11(2A), pp.100-114.
 Gupta, B., Kunnath, S.K., “Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures”, Earthquake Spectra; 16(2), pp. 367–392,
 Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C.A., (2002), “The Incremental Dynamic Analysis and its Application to PerformanceBased Earthquake Engineering, ” 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, Paper No.479.
 V. Bergami, X. Liu, C. NUTI. Evaluation of a modal pushover based incremental analysis. Proceedings of ACE, Vietri sul mare (Italy), 12-13 june, 2015.
 SAP2000, A Computer Program for Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of
Structures, California, Berkeley.
 PERFORM 3D, A Computer Program for Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, California, Berkeley.