نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد سمنان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران
2 عمران ، عمران،دانشگاه سمنان، شهر سمنان ، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Progressive failure is developed by expanding a local initial failure from one element to another, which ultimately leads to the collapse of the whole structure or a large part of it. This phenomenon causes local damage in structural elements which can result in massive losses and significant damage. Ductility, continuity, and degree of structural expansion are among the parameters that play an important role in reducing such consequences. In this study, the behaviour of a scaled four-span steel frame, with concrete filled steel tubular columns (CFST), was evaluated under progressive failure by removing the middle column. This work was done using the finite element method in ABAQUS. This work was carried out by examining the effect of reinforced triangular plate, haunch and angle steel reinforcements, reduced section in flange and web as well as post-tensioned FRP cables along with sensitivity analysis. The findings indicated that among the proposed anti-collapse methods, the maximum yield strength, the maximum ultimate strength and ductility ratio belong to angle steel reinforcement with 140.24 KN, reinforced triangular plate with 259.6 KN and RBS with 21.16 method. However, in a comprehensive comparison, the method of adding reinforced triangular plate was the best anti-collapse method since it avoids damage to the columns. Additionally, the change in compressive and tensile strength of the concrete did not have much effect on the frame behaviour in the progressive failure. Moreover, the frame with non-concrete columns has a ductility ratio 3 times higher than SRCT case, although the frame with SRCT columns has a 14 percent higher yield strength.
کلیدواژهها [English]
[2]Kim, J., & Kim, T. (2009). Assessment of progressive collapse-resisting capacity of steel moment frames. Journal Of Constructional Steel Research, 65(1), 169-179.
[3]Xu, M., Gao, S., Guo, L., Fu, F., & Zhang, S. (2018). Study on collapse mechanism of steel frame with CFST-columns under column-removal scenario. Journal Of Constructional Steel Research, 141, 275-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.11.020
[4]Han, L. H., Zhao, X. L., & Lu, H. (2014). Concrete-filled tubular members and connections. CRC Press
[5] Wang, Y., & Huang, L. (2014). Research on Numerical Model for Earthquake Induced Progressive Collapse of High-Rise Buildings. Applied Mechanics And Materials, 716-717, 223-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.716-717.223
[6] Dinu, F., Dubina, D., & Marginean, I. (2014). Improving the structural robustness of multi-story steel-frame buildings. Structure And Infrastructure Engineering, 11(8), 1028-1041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.927509
[7] Guo, L., Gao, S., & Fu, F. (2015). Structural performance of semi-rigid composite frame under column loss. Engineering Structures, 95, 112-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.049
[8] Jeyarajan, S., Liew, J., & Koh, C. (2015). Vulnerability of simple braced steel building under extreme load. The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, 8(4), 219-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19373260.2015.1068385
[9] Pirmoz, A., & Liu, M. (2016). Finite element modeling and capacity analysis of post-tensioned steel frames against progressive collapse. Engineering Structures, 126, 446-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.005
[10] Li, L., Wang, W., Chen, Y., & Teh, L. (2017). Column-wall failure mode of steel moment connection with inner diaphragm and catenary mechanism. Engineering Structures, 131, 553-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.032
[11] Mahmoudi,M.,Teimoori,T.,& Kozani, H.(2015).Presenting displacement-based nonlinear static analysis method to calculate structural response against progressive collapse . international journal of civil engineering,13(4),478-485
[12] McConnell, J., Cotter, T., & Rollins, T. (2015). Finite element analysis assessing partial catenary action in steel beams. Journal Of Constructional Steel Research, 109, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.004
[13] Stylianidis, P., Nethercot, D., Izzuddin, B., & Elghazouli, A. (2015). Modelling of beam response for progressive collapse analysis. Structures, 3, 137-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.04.001
[14] DoD, U. S. (2009). Unified facilities criteria: design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03. United States Department of Defense
[15]Mohamed, O. (2015). Calculation of load increase factors for assessment of progressive collapse potential in framed steel structures. Case Studies In Structural Engineering, 3, 11-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csse.2015.01.001
[16] Lee, J. & Fenves, G. (1998). Plastic-Damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures. J. Eng. Mech., 124(8), 892-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)
[17] Thorenfeldt, E., Tomaszewicz, A., & Jensen, J. J. (1987, June). Mechanical properties of high-strength concrete and application in design. In Proceedings of the symposium utilization of high strength concrete (pp. 149-159). Norway: Tapir Trondheim
[18] Rahimi, E., & Estekanchi, H. (2015). Collapse assessment of steel moment frames using endurance time method. Earthquake Engineering And Engineering Vibration, 14(2), 347-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0027-0
[19] Pirmoz, A., & Liu, M. (2016). Finite element modeling and capacity analysis of post-tensioned steel frames against progressive collapse. Engineering Structures, 126, 446-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.005
[20]Ding, Y., Song, X., & Zhu, H. (2017). Probabilistic progressive collapse analysis of steel-concrete composite floor systems. Journal Of Constructional Steel Research, 129, 129-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.11.009
)