مهندسی سازه و ساخت

مهندسی سازه و ساخت

ارزیابی عملکرد قاب‌های خمشی فولادی دارای میراگرهای ویسکوز با استفاده از روش طراحی مستقیم مبتنی بر جابجایی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان
حسام عزیزی 1
سعید ملکی 2
جمال احمدی 3
مهدی اقبالی 3
1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری مهندسی سازه، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
2 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی سازه، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
3 دانشیار، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران
10.22065/jsce.2025.533555.3772
چکیده
در سال‌های اخیر، روش طراحی مبتنی بر عملکرد (PBD) به عنوان یک رویکرد پیشرفته برای طراحی سازه‌های مختلف با رفتار لرزه‌ای قابل پیش‌بینی، توجه زیادی را به خود جلب کرده است. در میان روش‌های مختلف PBD، طراحی مبتنی بر جابجایی مستقیم (DDBD) به دلیل توانایی‌اش در دستیابی قابل اعتماد به سطوح عملکرد هدف تحت بارگذاری لرزه‌ای، به عنوان یک روش بسیار مؤثر ظهور کرده است. این مطالعه سعی دارد عملکرد لرزه‌ای قاب‌های خمشی فولادی (SMRF) مجهز به میراگرهای ویسکوز را با استفاده از رویکرد DDBD ارزیابی کند و نتایج را با روش‌های طراحی مرسوم مقایسه کند. سه SMRF، پیکربندی‌های 3، 6 و 9 طبقه، با استفاده از تحلیل استاتیکی غیرخطی (تحلیل پوش‌اور) طراحی شدند. پارامترهای کلیدی پاسخ لرزه‌ای، از جمله نسبت‌های رانش بین طبقه‌ای (IDR) و نیروهای برشی پایه، استخراج و تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. یافته‌های این مطالعه نشان می‌دهد که روش DDBD به طور مؤثر اهداف عملکرد هدف را برآورده می‌کند و رفتار سازه‌ای کنترل‌شده را تحت تحریک لرزه‌ای تضمین می‌کند. علاوه بر این، در مقایسه با روش‌های سنتی طراحی مبتنی بر نیرو (FBD)، DDBD حاشیه ایمنی بالاتری را فراهم می‌کند و کارایی سازه‌ای را بهبود می‌بخشد. این مطالعه نتیجه می‌گیرد که DDBD یک رویکرد طراحی قوی و قابل اعتماد برای قاب‌های خمشی فولادی با میراگرهای ویسکوز است. کاربرد آن نه تنها تاب‌آوری لرزه‌ای را افزایش می‌دهد، بلکه عملکرد سازه را نیز بهینه می‌کند و آسیب‌های احتمالی در هنگام زلزله را کاهش می‌دهد. این مزایا، DDBD را به روشی ترجیحی برای طراحی لرزه‌ای مدرن، به ویژه در سیستم‌های سازه‌ای میراگر، تبدیل می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
روش طراحی مبتنی بر نیرو
قاب‌های خمشی فولادی ویژه
ارزیابی لرزه‌ای
نسبت جابجایی نسبی بین طبقات
برش پایه

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames with Viscous Dampers Using the Direct Displacement-Based Design Method

نویسندگان English

Hesam Azizi 1
Saeed Maleki 2
Jamal Ahmadi 3
Mahdi Eghbali 3
1 PhD Graduate in Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
2 Ms.c Graduate in Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
چکیده English

In recent years, the performance-based design method (PBD) has gained significant attention as an advanced approach for designing different structures with predictable seismic behavior. Among various PBD methodologies, direct displacement-based design (DDBD) has emerged as a particularly effective method due to its ability to reliably achieve target performance levels under seismic loading. This study tries to evaluate the seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames (SMRFs) equipped with viscous dampers using the DDBD approach and compares the results with conventional design methods. Three SMRFs, 3-, 6-, and 9-story configurations, were designed using nonlinear static analysis (pushover analysis). Key seismic response parameters, including inter-story drift ratios (IDR) and base shear forces, were extracted and analyzed. The findings of the study demonstrate that the DDBD method effectively meets target performance objectives, ensuring controlled structural behavior under seismic excitation. Furthermore, compared to traditional force-based design (FBD) methods, DDBD provides a higher safety margin and improved structural efficiency. The study concludes that DDBD is a robust and reliable design approach for steel moment frames incorporating viscous dampers. Its application not only enhances seismic resilience but also optimizes structural performance, reducing potential damage during earthquakes. These advantages make DDBD a preferred method for modern seismic design, particularly in damped structural systems.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Force-based design method
Special steel moment frames
Seismic evaluation
Inter-story drift ratio
Base shear
1.      Priestley, M. J. N. (2003). Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering, Revisited: The Ninth Mallet Milne Lecture, 2003. Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia.
2.      Priestley, M. N. (1997). Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering. Concrete International, 19(2), 54-63.
3.      Maley, T. J., Sullivan, T. J., & Corte, G. D. (2010). Development of a displacement-based design method for steel dual systems with buckling-restrained braces and moment-resisting frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14(S1), 106-140.
4.      Malla, N., & Wijeyewickrema, A. C. (2021, December). Direct displacement-based design of coupled walls with steel shear link coupling beams. In Structures (Vol. 34, pp. 2746-2764). Elsevier.
5.      Liu, J., Xu, L., & Xie, X. (2022). Seismic design and performance of a steel frame-shear plate shear wall with self-centering energy dissipation braces structure. Journal of Building Engineering, 51, 104336.
6.      Ureña, A. G., Tremblay, R., & Rogers, C. A. (2021). Earthquake-resistant design of steel frames with intentionally eccentric braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 178, 106483.
7.      Moradpour, S., & Dehestani, M. (2019, December). Optimal DDBD procedure for designing steel structures with nonlinear fluid viscous dampers. In Structures (Vol. 22, pp. 154-174). Elsevier.
8.      Alehojjat, S. B., Bahar, O., & Yakhchalian, M. (2021, December). Improvements in the direct displacement-based design procedure for mid-rise steel MRFs equipped with viscous dampers. In Structures (Vol. 34, pp. 1636-1650). Elsevier.
9.      Mohebbi, M., Noruzvand, M., Dadkhah, H., & Shakeri, K. (2022). Direct displacement-based design approach for isolated structures equipped with supplemental fluid viscous damper. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103684.
10.   Kalapodis, N. A., Muho, E. V., & Beskos, D. E. (2022). Seismic design of plane steel MRFS, EBFS and BRBFS by improved direct displacement-based design method. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 153, 107111.
11.   Shakeri, K., & Dadkhah, H. (2021). Development of DDBD for steel MRFs using inelastic response-based seismic lateral force distribution. Journal of Building Engineering, 43, 103063.
12.   Al-Mashaykhi, M., Rajeev, P., Wijesundara, K. K., & Hashemi, M. J. (2019). Displacement profile for displacement based seismic design of concentric braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 155, 233-248.
13.   Yan, L., & Gong, J. (2019). Development of displacement profiles for direct displacement based seismic design of regular reinforced concrete frame structures. Engineering Structures, 190, 223-237.
14.   Seo, C. Y., Karavasilis, T. L., Ricles, J. M., & Sause, R. (2014). Seismic performance and probabilistic collapse resistance assessment of steel moment resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 43(14), 2135-2154.
15.   Milanchian, R., & Hosseini, M. (2019). Study of vertical seismic isolation technique with nonlinear viscous dampers for lateral response reduction. Journal of Building Engineering, 23, 144-154.
16.   Mirzai, N. M., Attarnejad, R., & Hu, J. W. (2021). Experimental investigation of smart shear dampers with re-centering and friction devices. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 102018.
17.   Luo, Z., Xue, J., Qi, L., & Sui, Y. (2021). Experimental and numerical study on viscously-damped outriggers with amplifying devices. Journal of Building Engineering, 38, 102172.
18.   Ramirez, O., Constantinou, M. C., & Kitcher, C. A. (2001). Development and Evaluation of Simplified Procedures for Passive Energy Disipation Systems. MCEER-00-0010. Buffalo, NY.
19.   ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). (2005). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures-ASCE/SEI 7-05. American Society of Civil Engineers.
20.   Kitayama, S., & Constantinou, M. C. (2018). Seismic performance of buildings with viscous damping systems designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7-16. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(6), 04018050.
21.   Lin, Y. Y., Tsai, M. H., Hwang, J. S., & Chang, K. C. (2003). Direct displacement-based design for building with passive energy dissipation systems. Engineering structures, 25(1), 25-37.
22.   Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2006). Displacement-based design of supplemental dampers for seismic retrofit of a framed structure. Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(6), 873-883.
23.   Sullivan, T. J., & Lago, A. (2012). Towards a simplified direct DBD procedure for the seismic design of moment resisting frames with viscous dampers. Engineering Structures, 35, 140-148.
24.   Sullivan, T. J. (2009). Direct displacement-based design of a RC wall-steel EBF dual system with added dampers. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 42(3), 167-178.
25.   Noruzvand, M., Mohebbi, M., & Shakeri, K. (2020). Modified direct displacement‐based design approach for structures equipped with fluid viscous damper. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 27(1), e2465.
26.   Bruschi, E., Quaglini, V., & Calvi, P. M. (2022). A simplified design procedure for seismic upgrade of frame structures equipped with hysteretic dampers. Engineering Structures, 251, 113504.
27.   Guo, L., Wang, J., Wang, W., & Wang, H. (2023, November). Performance-based seismic design and vulnerability assessment of concrete frame retrofitted by metallic dampers. In Structures (Vol. 57, p. 105073). Elsevier.
28.   Li, Z., Cheng, X., Li, Y., & Gao, X. (2024). Substructure-based design method for vertically irregular steel buckling-restrained braced frame structures. Engineering Structures, 306, 117784.
29.   Mustafa, Z. N. E., & Saito, T. (2024). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Multi-Story Resistance Capacitance-Coupled Shear Wall Buildings with Energy-Dissipation Dampers. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10734.
30.   Azizi, H., 2025, July. Numerical evaluation of cyclic and seismic performance of three-core buckling-resistant braces with partially re-centering properties. In Structures (Vol. 77, p. 109078). Elsevier.
31.   Azizi, H., & Ahmadi, J. (2024). Investigating the seismic behavior of low-rise steel frames equipped with dual-core self-centering buckling-restrained brace. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 185, 108905.
32.   ISIR 2800, Seismic resistant design of buildings (2014) – Code of practice, Standards and Industrial Research of Iran, (in Persian).
33.   Iranian code for loading, (2014) "Design loads for building", National Regulation of Building, Part 6, (in Persian).
34.   Iranian code for steel structures, (2014) "Design and Construction of Steel Structures", National Regulations of Building, Part 10, (in Persian).
35.   Pekelnicky, R., Engineers, S. D., Chris Poland, S. E., & Engineers, N. D. (2012). ASCE 41-13: Seismic evaluation and retrofit rehabilitation of existing buildings. Proceedings of the SEAOC.
36.   Ohtori, Y., Christenson, R. E., Spencer Jr, B. F., & Dyke, S. J. (2004). Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. Journal of engineering mechanics, 130(4), 366-385.
37.   Azizi, H. and Ahmadi, J., 2025. Mitigation of residual deformations in steel braced frames through an innovative Y-shaped hybrid buckling restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 229, p.109533.
38.   Azizi, H., & Ahmadi, J. (2024). Seismic Performance Evaluation of Two-and Three-Story Steel Frames with an Upgraded Hybrid Buckling-Restrained Brace. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 1-27.
39.   Azizi, H., Eghbali, M., & Ahmadi, J. (2024). Numerical Investigation on the Efficiency of Self-Centering Two-Yield Buckling Restrained Brace on Low-Rise Steel Frames. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 1-24.

  • تاریخ دریافت 22 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 24 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 آذر 1404