مهندسی سازه و ساخت

مهندسی سازه و ساخت

بکارگیری الگوریتم فراابتکاری به منظور انتخاب استراتژی پاسخ به ریسک در صنعت ساختمان سبز (مطالعه موردی: شهر تهران)

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران
چکیده
اجرای موفقیت‌آمیز پروژه‌های ساختمانی در سرتاسر جهان مستلزم مجموعه‌ای از برنامه‌های مدیریت ریسک مؤثر است که در آن عدم قطعیت‌های مرتبط با ریسک‌ها و استراتژی‌های پاسخ مؤثر به دقت مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرند. این مطالعه با هدف ارائه یک رویکرد بهینه‌سازی فراابتکاری است که با آن استراتژی‌های پاسخ به ریسک انتخاب می‌شوند. الگوریتم بهینه‌سازی فراابتکاری قادر به انتخاب استراتژی‌های مناسب برای پاسخ به ریسک‌ها به صورت بهینه هستند. این انتخاب می‌تواند منجر به کاهش زمان، هزینه‌های پروژه و همچنین کاهش خسارات اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی شود. بر این اساس، از یک رویکرد دو مرحله‌ای در پژوهش حاضر استفاده می‌شود. در مرحله اول، تمامی ریسک‌های ساختمان سبز شناسایی و غربالگری شده و سپس در مرحله دوم با استفاده از یک مدل ریاضی و الگوریتم فراابتکاری یک روند حل برای به دست آوردن استراتژی مطلوب‌تر پاسخ به ریسک‌های ساختمان سبز در یک مطالعه موردی پروژه ساختمان سبز با توجه به زمان، هزینه و کیفیت ارائه نموده است. نتایج نشان می دهد برای 17 ریسک مهم ساختمان سبز شناسایی شده در پروژه، مربوط به 5 فعالیت مهم و بحرانی پروژه بر اساس سبد ریسک می باشد. با استفاده از مدل ریاضی ارایه شده، استراتژی‌های مناسب پاسخ به ریسک‌ها به صورت بهینه انتخاب شدند و سیستم مدیریت ریسک در این پروژه به صورت مناسبی جاری-سازی گردید. انتخاب استراتژی‌های مناسب پاسخ به ریسک‌ها در پروژه‌های ساختمان سبز یکی از دغدغه‌های ذینفعان پروژه می‌باشد که در پژوهش حاضر، یک الگوریتم فراابتکاری برای انتخاب استراتژی‌های پاسخ به ریسک پروژه‌های ساختمان سبز استفاده شده است. شهر تهران که با تعدد ساختمان‌های سبز متعدد مطالعه موردی پژوهش حاضر انتخاب شد. بدین منظور، کل ریسک‌های اثرگذار در بحث ساختمان سبز شناسایی و برای هر کدام از ریسک‌ها استراتژی پاسخ به ریسک مناسب داده شد
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Using Metaheuristic Algorithm to Select Risk Response Strategy in Green Construction Industry (Case Study: Tehran City)

نویسندگان English

Ayoub Hassanvand 1
Mohammad Ehsanifar 2
Ehsanullah Zaighami 3
1 PhD Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
چکیده English

Successful implementation of construction projects worldwide requires a set of effective risk management plans in which the uncertainties associated with risks and effective response strategies are carefully considered. This study aims to present a metaheuristic optimization approach with which risk response strategies are selected. Metaheuristic optimization algorithms are able to select appropriate strategies to respond to risks optimally. This selection can lead to reduced project time, costs, and also reduced social and environmental damages. Accordingly, a two-stage approach is used in the present study. In the first stage, all green building risks are identified and screened, and then in the second stage, a solution process is presented using a mathematical model and metaheuristic algorithm to obtain the most optimal strategy for responding to green building risks in a case study of a green building project with respect to time, cost, and quality. The results show that for the 17 major green building risks identified in the project, they are related to 5 major and critical project activities based on the risk portfolio. Using the presented mathematical model, appropriate risk response strategies were selected optimally and the risk management system was implemented appropriately in this project. Selecting appropriate risk response strategies in green building projects is one of the concerns of the project stakeholders, and in the present study, a meta-heuristic algorithm has been used to select risk response strategies for green building projects. Tehran, which has a large number of green buildings, was selected as a case study for the present study. For this purpose, all the influential risks in the green building discussion were identified and an appropriate risk response strategy was given for each of the risks.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Risk Management
Green Construction Project
Response to Risk
Meta-Heuristic Algorithm
Tehran City
[1] Girma, Y., Terefe, H., Pauleit, S., & Kindu, M. (2019). Urban green infrastructure planning in Ethiopia: The case of emerging towns of Oromia special zone surrounding Finfinnee. Journal of Urban Management, 8(1), 75-88
[2] Zarrinpoor, N., Amiri, M., & Nematollahi, M. H. (2021). The Risk Evaluation of Green Buildings Using A Hybrid Procedure of DEMATEL and Analytic Network Process. Decisions and Operations Research.
[3] Chen, J. X., & Chen, J. (2017). Supply chain carbon foot printing and responsibility allocation under emission regulations. Journal of environmental management, 188, 255-267.
[4] Onuoha, I. J., Aliagha, G. U., & Rahman, M. S. A. (2018). Modelling the effects of green building incentives and green building skills on supply factors affecting green commercial property investment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 814-823.
[5] Poveda, C. A., & Young, R. (2015). Potential benefits of developing and implementing environmental and sustainability rating systems: Making the case for the need of diversification. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 4(1), 1-11
[6] Ghaobadi, J., Rezaeian, J., & Haji Aghaei Keshteli, M. (2019). Identification and Prioritization the Risks of Green Building Projects Based on the Combination of FANP and FDEMATEL: (Case study: Savadkooh County). Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering51(3), 599-616. doi: 10.22060/ceej.2017.13302.5398
[7] Guan, L., Abbasi, A., & Ryan, M. J. (2020). Analyzing green building project risk interdependencies using Interpretive Structural Modeling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120372.
[8] Xiang, T., & Shu, X. Y. (2018). Identification of Risk in Green Building Projects based on the Perspective of Sustainability [J]. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 439, No. 3)
[9] Rezaei, S., Abortion seller, E., Athari Niko Rovan, H. (2016). Needs assessment to know the solutions to improve the risk management of the implementation of building information modeling in the construction industry. International Civil Engineering Conference. Architecture and urban planning of contemporary Iran. Tehran.
[10] Rahimi, Y., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Iranmanesh, S. H., & Vaez-Alaei, M. (2018). Hybrid approach to construction project risk management with simultaneous FMEA/ISO 31000/evolutionary algorithms: Empirical optimization study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6), 04018043
[11] Zegordi, S. H., Nazari, A., & Rezaee Nik, E. (2014). Project risk assessment by a hybrid approach using fuzzy-anp and fuzzy-topsis. Sharif Journal of Indusrial Engineering and Management, 29(1), 3-14.
[12] Xiao, L., Bie, L., & Bai, X. (2021). Controlling the schedule risk in green building projects: Buffer management framework with activity dependence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123852.
[13] Qiang, G., Cao, D., Wu, G., Zhao, X., & Zuo, J. (2021). Dynamics of collaborative networks for green building projects: case study of Shanghai. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(3), 05021001.
[14] Cheraghi, E., Khalilzadeh, M., and Cheraghi, A., and Rahimi, Y. (2018). selection of response strategies to environmental risk of construction projects using meta-heuristic algorithms (case study: Saba construction complex project. 4(21). 61-76.
[15] Wang, L., Chan, D. W. M., Darko, A., & Oluleye, B. I. (2024). Review on green buildings: A perspective of risk management process. Journal of Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108738
[16] Wuni, I. Y., Bao, Z., Yevu, S. K., & Tetteh, M. O. (2023). Theorizing the path dependencies and hierarchical structure of the multidimensional risks in green building projects. Journal of Building Engineering, 68, 106069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106069
[17] Wang, L., & Chan, D. W. (2022, December). Risk Assessments with Probabilistic Linguistic Information for Green Building Projects-The Case of Vietnam. In International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (pp. 1396-1404). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[18] Nguyen, H. D., & Macchion, L. (2022). Exploring critical risk factors for Green Building projects in developing countries: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Cleaner Production381, 135138.
[19] Li, Y., Song, H., Sang, P., Chen, P.-H., & Liu, X. (2019). Review of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for green building projects. Building and Environment, 158, 182-191.
[20] Bon-Gang, H. (2018). Performance and improvement of green construction projects. Science Direct, 15-22.
[21] Tao, X., & Xiang-Yuan, S. (2018). Identification of risk in green building projects based on the perspective of sustainability. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
[22] Park, J., Park, B., Cha, Y., & Hyun, C. (2016). Risk factors assessment considering change degree for mega-projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 218, 50-55.
[23] Yang, R. J., & Zou, P. X. (2014). Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: A social network model. Building and Environment, 73, 208-222.
[24] Yang, R. J., Zou, P. X., & Wang, J. (2016). Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects. International journal of project management, 34(1), 66-81.
[25] daneshvar, A. , Homayounfar, M. and akhavan, E. (2019). Developing a classification Method for Imbalanced Dataset Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. Industrial Management Studies17(55), 161-183. doi: 10.22054/jims.2019.31226.2036
[26] Qin, X., Mo, Y., & Jing, L. (2016). Risk perceptions of the life-cycle of green buildings in China. Journal of cleaner production, 126, 148-158.
[27] Khoshnava, S. M., Rostami, R., Valipour, A., Ismail, M., & Rahmat, A. R. (2018). Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi criteria decision making method. Journal of cleaner production173, 82-99.
 [28] Hasanpour Jesri Z S, Hassannayebi E, Abolghasemian M. Optimization Models for Vehicle Routing Problems with Simultaneous Delivery and Pickup under Time Window Constraints. jor 2024; 21 (2) :35-55
[29] Heydari Kushalshah, T., Daneshmand-Mehr, M., & Abolghasemian, M. (2023). Hybrid modelling for urban water supply system management based on a bi-objective mathematical model and system dynamics: A case study in Guilan province. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 15(1), 260-279.
[30] Abolghasemian, M., Bigdeli, H., & Shamami, N. (2024). Modeling the positioning of support forces in future battles using data envelopment analysis and the principles of natural and managerial accessibility. Defensive Future Studies, 9(32), 65-98.
[31] Verma, S., Pant, M., & Snasel, V. (2021). A comprehensive review on NSGA-II for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. IEEE access9, 57757-57791.

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 09 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 22 اردیبهشت 1404