Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Experimental study on precast HPC slab-steel composite floor with high-strength grout shear key under uniform stacking loading

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master of Science, Department of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
10.22065/jsce.2025.547780.3820
Abstract
In steel structures, selecting a floor system that lowers the structure’s self-weight, reduces labor-intensive tasks, and accelerates construction is crucial. Conventional steel-concrete composite floors are among the most commonly used composite floor systems, but the need for steel decking, temporary formwork, and in-situ concreting stops them from being ideal. This study introduces an innovative steel-concrete composite floor system, comprising precast high-performance concrete (HPC) slabs, steel beams with pre-welded shear studs, and high-strength expansive grout as a shear key, in both longitudinal and transverse directions. This composite floor system eliminates the above-mentioned problems of conventional steel-concrete composite floors. Thin HPC precast slabs lower the overall structural weight and seismic forces, facilitate the use of slender structural members, and accelerate construction. For more accurate evaluation of the composite action in the proposed floor system, a composite specimen was subjected to uniform stacking loading, which, unlike most previous research studies, takes advantage of having two spans, multiple precast slabs, and full-scale size. After bearing 15.2 kN/m² of uniform stacking load, the composite specimen not only did not fail, but also did not experience plastic deformation. The maximum deflection of the specimen’s middle beam was 6.7% less than that of an equal-sized in-situ steel-concrete composite floor. According to AISC 360-22 and ASCE/SEI 7-22, the composite specimen satisfies the serviceability deflection limit and minimum design loads for most residential and office uses. The proposed composite floor offers a reliable and efficient solution that expedites flooring in steel structures.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Block, P., Calvo Barentin, C., Ranaudo, F. and Paulson, N. (2020). Imposing challenges, disruptive changes: rethinking the floor slab. In: The Materials Book. Berlin: Ruby Press, pp.214–219.
[2] Tan, X., Fang, Z., Peng, Z., Zheng, H., Tang, S. and Liao, Y. (2022). Tensile behavior of a prefabricated Steel–UHPC composite deck system with notched perfobond strips. Engineering Structures, 268, p.114737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114737
[3] Han, C.X., He, H.L., Luo, Q.J., Zhao, Y.L. and Zhang, J.C. (2024). Experimental and theoretical study on static performance of prefabricated steel-bar truss frame-precast concrete composite hollow-core slabs. Structures, 61, p.105971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105971
[4] Pang, R., Zhang, L., Zhang, T., Dang, L. and Wang, W. (2023). Experimental study and numerical simulation on the transverse force transmission mechanism of discretely connected precast RC floor. Structures, 56, p.104842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.07.032
[5] Wang, H., Liu, X.G., Yue, Q.R. and Zheng, M.Z. (2022). Shear resistance of a novel wet connection for prefabricated composite beams under shear-bending coupling loading. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, p.103636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103636
[6] Wang, H., Wang, N., Liu, X.G., Yue, Q.R., Yan, J.L. and Zhang, Y. (2024). Effects of UHPC shear key on strengthening shear performances of wet joint in prefabricated composite beams. Engineering Structures, 299, p.117130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117130
[7] Yan, J.L., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., Yue, Q. and Liu, X.G. (2024). Tensile and flexural performances of prefabricated slabs with wet UHPC connection. Journal of Building Engineering, 93, p.109870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109870
[8] Fang, S., Zhang, S., Cao, Z., Zhao, G., Fang, Z., Ma, Y. and Jiang, H. (2023). Effects of stud aspect ratio and cover thickness on push-out performance of thin full-depth precast UHPC slabs with grouped short studs: Experimental evaluation and design considerations. Journal of Building Engineering, 67, p.105910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105910
[9] Fang, Z., Fang, H., Huang, J., Jiang, H. and Chen, G. (2022). Static behavior of grouped stud shear connectors in steel–precast UHPC composite structures containing thin full-depth slabs. Engineering Structures, 252, p.113484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113484
[10] Benedetty, C.A., dos Santos, V.B., Krahl, P.A., Rossi, A., de Andrade Silva, F., Cardoso, D.C.T. and Martins, C.H. (2023). Flexural and shear behavior of steel-UHPC composite beams: a review. Engineering Structures, 293, p.116649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116649
[11] Zhang, Y., Cai, S., Zhu, Y., Fan, L. and Shao, X. (2020). Flexural responses of steel-UHPC composite beams under hogging moment. Engineering Structures, 206, p.110134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110134
[12] Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Hussein, H.H. and Cai, S. (2020). Flexural study on UHPC–steel composite beams with joints under negative bending moment. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 25(10), p.04020084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001619
[13] de Oliveira, V.M., dos Santos, V.B., Rossi, A., Benedito, A.V., Krahl, P.A., Martins, C.H., de Andrade Silva, F. and Cardoso, D.C.T. (2025). Steel-UHPC composite castellated beams under hogging bending: Experimental and numerical investigation. Engineering Structures, 331, p.120012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120012
[14] Lopes, E. and Simoes, R. (2008). Experimental and analytical behaviour of composite slabs. Steel and Composite Structures, 8(5), pp.361–388. https://doi.org/10.12989/SCS.2008.8.5.361
[15] Melcher, J., Karmazinova, M., Krsik, J. and Krivakova, J. (2016). Verification of experiment of vacuum loading on slab. In: Advances and Trends in Engineering Sciences and Technologies II: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Engineering Sciences and Technologies. High Tatras Mountains, Slovak Republic: CRC Press, pp.201. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315393827-36
[16] Shen, G.L. (2001). Performance evaluation of new corrugated-type embossments for composite deck. PhD thesis. Virginia Tech. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/34452 [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[17] John, K., Ashraf, M., Weiss, M. and Al-Ameri, R. (2023). Experimental study and numerical modelling of a novel two-way steel-concrete composite slab. Structures, 57, p.105096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105096
[18] Hamada, H.M., Abed, F., Katman, H.Y.B., Humada, A.M., Al Jawahery, M.S., Majdi, A., Yousif, S.T. and Thomas, B.S. (2023). Effect of silica fume on the properties of sustainable cement concrete. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 24, pp.8887–8908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.147
[19] Mostofinejad, D., Bahmani, H. and Afshar, J. (2023). Prediction of mechanical properties of high-performance concrete (HPC) reinforced with steel fibers. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 47(4), pp.1971–1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01126-6
[20] Sanjuán, M.Á., Argiz, C., Gálvez, J.C. and Moragues, A. (2015). Effect of silica fume fineness on the improvement of Portland cement strength performance. Construction and Building Materials, 96, pp.55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.092
[21] ASTM International. (2024). ASTM C39/C39M-24: Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available at: https://www.astm.org [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[22] ASTM International. (2021). ASTM C1611/C1611M-21: Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available at: https://www.astm.org [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[23] ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D3039/D3039M-17: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available at: https://www.astm.org [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[24] ASTM International. (2024). ASTM E8/E8M-24: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available at: https://www.astm.org [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[25] Iran Concrete Technical Specialized Clinic Group. (2025). Dezoflow FH-1000. Tehran (IR). Available at: https://clinicbeton.com [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[26] ASTM International. (2020). ASTM C1437-20: Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available at: https://www.astm.org [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[27] ASTM International. (2023). ASTM C230/C230M-23: Standard Specification for Flow Table for Use in Tests of Hydraulic Cement. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available at: https://www.astm.org [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[28] Noor, F.A. and Boswell, L.F. (1992). Small scale modelling of concrete structures. London: Elsevier Applied Science.
[29] American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2022). ANSI/AISC 360-22: Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction.
[30] Opkon Optic Elektronik A.S. (2025). OPKON LPS 100. Available at: https://www.opkon.com.tr/Content/product/pdf/pdf-6f5cef66.pdf [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[31] Tokyo Measuring Instruments Laboratory Co., Ltd. (TML). (2025). Data Logger TDS-540. Available at: https://www.tml.jp/eng/documents/Catalog/TDS-540_E3011F.pdf [Accessed 8 September 2025].
[32] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2022). ASCE/SEI 7-22: Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415788

  • Receive Date 27 September 2025
  • Revise Date 27 October 2025
  • Accept Date 13 November 2025