Numerical Study of Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction Effects on Deflection Amplification Factor and Correction for Special Steel Moment Frames

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Considering the importance of the deflection amplification factor ,Cd, in the structural design and the lack of consideration of the structure-soil-structure interaction effects on structural response, this paper has investigated the effects of the most important parameters affecting this factor in the structure-soil-structure systems. Key parameters are period of main (T1) and adjacent (T2) structures, distance between the structures (d) and type of soil. The purpose of this study is to correct the Cd coefficient in steel moment frames under the influence of structural-soil-structure interaction effect. For this aim, 6 structures of 2 to 15 story based on two types of clay soil in a three distances of zero, 10 and 25 meters using direct method is modelled and analyzed with nonlinear time history method. According to the results, most of the story drifts is concentrated at the first story due to soft base. The minimum ratio of first story drift with respect to the fix-base, is 1. 1 and the maximum is 3.61. Increasing T1 And T2, the value of this ratio is increased. For the main structures with T1 in the range of 0.7 to 1.5 times the soil period, the structural drift is intensified. Finally, using the results of this study and regression analysis, a correlation coefficient for the Cd is presented based on the spectral response of the structural drift. Based on the obtained relationship, story drifts, especially at first story, should be increased for the design of the structures .

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]Lou, M. Wang, H. Chen, X. and Zhai, Y. (2011). Structure–soil–structure interaction: Literature review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 31, pp. 1724-1731.
[2]. Warburton, G. B. Richardson, J. D. and Webster, J. J. (1972). Harmonic Response of Masses on an Elastic Half Space. Journal of Engineering for Industry, vol. 94, pp. 193-200.
[3]Kobori, T. Minal, R. and Kusakabe, K. Dynamical Characteristics of Soil-Structure Cross-Interaction System, I. (1973).
[4]Lin, H. T. Roesset, J. and Tassoulas, J. (1987). Dynamic interaction between adjacent foundations. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, vol. 15, pp. 323-343.
[5]Guan, F.and Novak, M. (1994). Transient Response of Multiple Rigid Foundations on an Elastic, Homogeneous Half-Space. Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 61, pp. 656-663.
[6]Guan, F.and Novak, M. (1994). Transient Response of an Elastic Homogeneous Half-Space to Suddenly Applied Rectangular Loading. Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 61, pp. 256-263.
[7]Qian, J. and. Beskos, D. E. (1996). Harmonic wave response of two 3-D rigid surface foundations, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 15, pp. 95-110.
[8]Ghandil, M. and Behnamfar, F. (2015). The near-field method for dynamic analysis of structures on soft soils including inelastic soil–structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 75, pp. 1-17.
[9]Ghandil, M. Behnamfar, F. and Vafaeian, M. (2016). Dynamic responses of structure–soil–structure systems with an extension of the equivalent linear soil modeling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 80, pp. 149-162.
[10]Clouteau, D. Broc, D. Devésa, G. Guyonvarh, V. and Massin, P. (2012) Calculation methods of Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction (3SI) for embedded buildings: Application to NUPEC tests. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 129-142.
[11]Trombetta, N. W. Mason, H. B. Hutchinson, T. C. Zupan, J. D. Bray, J. D. and Kutter, B. L. (2014). Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Centrifuge Test Observations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 140.
[12]Trombetta, N. W. Mason, H. B. Hutchinson, T. C. Zupan, J. D. Bray, J. D. and Kutter, B. L. (2015). Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Engineering Demands. Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 141.
[13]ASCE7-10, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010.
[14]NIST-GCR-12-917-21, "Soil-Structure Interaction for Building Structures," NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture (a partnership of the Applied Technology Council and the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering), 2012.
[15]Standard 2800, Design of structures against earrthquake ,Building and House Research Center (BHRC), 2014
[16]ASCE7-16, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2016.
[17]AISC360, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10), 2010.
[18]Ibarra, L. F.and Krawinkler, H. (2005). Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
[19]Lignos D. G. Krawinkler, H. and Whittaker, A. S. (2011). Prediction and validation of sidesway collapse of two scale models of a 4-story steel moment frame. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 40, pp. 807-825.
[20]ASCE41, "Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings," American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2013.
[21]Jeremic, B. Jie G. Preisig, M. and Tafazzoli, N. (2009). Time domain simulation of soil-foundation-structure interaction in non-uniform soils. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 38, p. 699.
[22]Z. Yang, J. Lu, and A. Elgamal, "OpenSees Soil Models and Solid-Fluid Fully Coupled Elements," User's Manual. Ver, vol. 1, 2008.
[23]OpenSees, "Open system for earthquake engineering simulation," Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.
[24]PEER ground motion database. Available: http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/