Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Investigating the influence of second order effects on the cyclic behavior of steel perforated beams

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 M.Sc. student, Faculty of engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Associate professor, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract
Implementation of openings in beams web has been introduced as an innovative method for improving seismic performance of steel moment frames. The limited length of the opening zone and formation of the Vierendeel mechanism in this area causes the reduction of beam horizontal length in nonlinear behavior range. This is while, the rigidity of the structural floor system prevents the reduction of the beam span length. This causes the creation of tensile force in the beam which is known as the second order effect. In this article a numerical study is conducted to evaluate the influence of the second order effects on the cyclic behavior of steel beams with web opening. For this purpose, a perforated steel beam has been modeled in Abaqus software and its results has been validated using laboratory test data. The numerical models have been analyzed considering different opening dimensions and three different profiles for the beam cross-section. This is done once with and once again without considering the second order effects and the results are compared. Based on the results, considering the second order effects changes the behavior of the beam in the reduced area and prevents the stiffness and strength decrease in the post-capping part of the hysteresis curve. The amount of additional strength caused by second order effects is negligible for drift ratios smaller than 2%, but it increases with the increase of loading amplitude. At 6% drift ratio, the amount of this additional strength varies between 44% and 120%, depending on the dimensions of the opening. Determination of this additional strength as a function of lateral drift ratio and opening dimensions for use in the analysis and design of beams with web openings can be considered as the main innovation of this research.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Rashidi, S., Hedayat, A.A. & Bameri, M. (2022). Evaluating the impact of replacing gusset plates with slotted metal dampers on the vibration behavior of concentrically braced frames. In: 6th international conference on researches in science & engineering & 3rd international congress on civil, architecture and urbanism in Asia, Bangkok, Thailand.
[2] Shin, M., Kim, S.P., Halterman, A. & Aschheim, M. (2017). Seismic toughness and failure mechanisms of reduced web-section beams: Phase 1 tests. Engineering Structures, Vol. 141, pp. 198-216, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.016.
[3] Shin, M., Kim, S.P., Halterman, A. & Aschheim, M. (2017). Seismic toughness and failure mechanisms of reduced web-section beams: Phase 2 tests. Engineering Structures, Vol. 141, pp. 607-623, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.046.
[4] Erfani, S., Akrami, V. & Mohammad-nejad, A. (2020). Lateral load resisting behavior of steel moment frames with reduced web section (RWS) beams. Structures, Vol. 28, pp. 251-265, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.060.
[5] Chaghazardi, S., TahamouliRoudsari, M., Oghabi, M., & Movahednia, M. (2023). Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of a New Reduced Beam Section Connection without Flange Tapering. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Published online. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2023.394078.3097.
[6] GanjiMorad, S., Oghabi, M., & TahamouliRoudsari, M. (2023). Investigation of Rigid Saddle Connection type II with Reduced Beam Sections and Web Stiffeners by Experimental Method. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Published online. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2023.394209.3100.
[7] Ghaderi, M., Gerami, M., & Vahdani, R. (2020). Investigating the effect of extremely low cyclic fatigue in steel moment frames with reduced beam section connections. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 7(3), 5-19. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2018.127480.1526.
[8] Hejazi, M. & Amere, F. (2021). Parametric study of behaviour of perforated yielding shear panel device as a vertical link beam in inverted v-braced steel frames under cyclic load. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Vol. 8(8), pp. 266-288. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2020.220995.2088.
[9] safi, M., Gholami Alam, I., Darvishan, E. & beheshti, S. (2020). Experimental modeling for effect of knee fuse perforated web on performance of structural knee fuse subjected to cyclic loading in steel knee braced frames. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Vol. 7(3), pp. 114-128. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2018.127235.1521.
[10] Hadi, A, Saffari, H. & Hedayat, A.A. (2011). Evaluation and study of the performance of steel beams having sinusoidal reduced beam web (RBW). In: 6th National Congress on Civil Engineering, Semnan, Iran.
[11] Aschheim, M.A. (2000). Moment-resistant structure, sustainer and method of resisting episodic loads. U.S. Patent No. 6012256, Washington DC, USA.
[12] Aschheim, M. & Halterman, A. (2002). Reduced web section beams, Phase One: Experimental findings and design implications. In: 7th US national conference on earthquake engineering, Boston, Massachusetts.
[13] Akrami, V. (2021). Development of Strut Model for Evaluating Shear Capacity of Beams with Elongated Circular Web Openings. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Vol. 8(5), pp. 179-197. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2019.202614.1958.
[14] Zeytinci, B.M., Şahin, M., Güler, M.A. & Tsavdaridis, K.D. (2021). A practical design formulation for perforated beams with openings strengthened with ring type stiffeners subject to Vierendeel actions. Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 43, Article No. 102915, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102915.
[15] Classen, M., Kurz, W., Schäfer, M. & Hegger, J. (2019). A mechanical design model for steel and concrete composite members with web openings. Engineering structures, Vol. 197, Article No. 109417, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109417.
[16] Carvalho, A.S., Rossi, A. & Martins, C.H. (2022). Assessment of lateral–torsional buckling in steel I-beams with sinusoidal web openings. Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 175, 109242, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109242.
[17] Shamass, R., Ferreira, F.P.V., Limbachiya, V., Santos, L.F.P. & Tsavdaridis, K.D. (2022). Web-post buckling prediction resistance of steel beams with elliptically-based web openings using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 180, 109959, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109959.
[18] Chang, H.Y., Liao, C.T., Kang, S.Y., Ho, S.Y. & Lai, C.M. (2023). Seismic performance of RWS moment connections to steel box-columns and H-beams with general sections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 201, Article No. 107691, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107691.
[19] Morkhade, S.G. & Gupta, L.M. (2023). Critical study of steel beams with web openings. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 24(1), 24-35, doi: 10.1080/13287982.2022.2117319.
[20] Jalali, M., & Rafiee, A. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Bolted Moment Frame with Reduced Beam Section. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Published online. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2023.393962.3098.
[21] Sayed, A.M. (2022). Numerical study of the effects of web openings on the load capacity of steel beams with corrugated webs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 196, 107418, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107418.
[22] Meng, B., Xiong, Y., Zhong, W., Duan, S. & Li, H. (2023). Progressive collapse behaviour of composite substructure with large rectangular beam-web openings. Engineering Structures, Vol. 295, 116861, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116861.
[23] Qiao, H., Xie, X. & Chen, Y. (2022). Improvement of progressive collapse resistance for a steel frame system with beam–web opening. Engineering Structures, Vol. 256, Article No. 113995, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113995.
[24] Nazaralizadeh, H., Ronagh, H., Memarzadeh, P. & Behnamfar, F. (2022). A practical design approach to bolted end-plate vertical-slits RWS connection. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 20, pp. 547–586, doi: 10.1007/s10518-021-01238-2.
[25] Almutairi, F.F., Tsavdaridis, K.D., Alonso Rodriguez, A., Asteris, P.G. & Lemonis, M.E. (2023). Hysteretic Behaviour of Composite Reduced Web Section (RWS) Connections for Seismic Applications. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, published online, doi: 10.1080/13632469.2023.2204172.
[26] Akrami, V., & Erfani, S. (2016). Review and assessment of design methodologies for perforated steel beams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(2), 04015148, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001421.
[27] Erfani, S., & Akrami, V. (2016). Evaluation of cyclic fracture in perforated beams using micromechanical fatigue model. Steel and Composite Structures, 20(4), 913-930.
[28] American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM A992, (2015). Standard Specification for Structural Steel Shapes. West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
[29] American Institute of Steel Construction, AISC 341, (2016). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL, USA.
Volume 11, Issue 10 - Serial Number 87
January 2025
Pages 223-244

  • Receive Date 06 October 2023
  • Revise Date 20 February 2024
  • Accept Date 18 April 2024