Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Effect of NaOH molarity and ratio of Na2SiO3 to NaOH on fresh and hardened properties of geopolymer mortars containing wastes from iron and aluminum factories

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PHD student,Technical Faculty, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran
2 Associate professor, Technical faculty, Guilan university, Rasht, Iran
Abstract
In this article, the ground granulated blast-furnace slag and red mud, which are waste products of iron and aluminum factories, were used as aluminosilicate base materials in the design of geopolymer mortar mixture. The activation of base materials was done with a combination of sodium hydroxide solution (caustic soda) and sodium silicate (water glass). In order to investigate the influence of soda molarity and water glass to soda ratio on flow ability, setting time, drying shrinkage, as well as compressive and flexural strengths, 9 mixes of geopolymer mortar were prepared and cured at ambient temperature. Moreover, molar ratios of H2O/Na2O and SiO2/Na2O were defined and investigated as key parameters affecting the fresh and hardened properties of geopolymeric mortar. The results of the experiments showed that with the increase in the molar ratio of H2O/Na2O in the mixture design, the flow ability of the mortar increases. Also, there is an optimal value for the molar ratio of SiO2/Na2O, so that by passing it, the compressive and flexural strength decrease. Considering the use of waste materials in the design of geopolymer mortar and as well as the optimization in the use of alkaline activators, it can be concluded that the conducted research is an effective and forward step in the production of geopolymeric products with an environmental and economic approach.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Singh, N.B., and Middendorf, B. (2020). Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 237, 117455.
[2] Duan, P., Yan, C., and Luo, W. (2016). A novel waterproof, fast setting and high early strength repair material derived from metakaolin geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 69-73.
[3] Zhang, W., Yao, X., Yang, T., Liu, C., ‌and Zhang, Z. (2018). Increasing mechanical strength and acid resistance of geopolymers by incorporating different siliceous materials. Construction and Building Materials, 175, 411-421.
[4] Lahoti, M., Tan, K. H., ‌and Yang, E. H. (2019). A critical review of geopolymer properties for structural fire-resistance applications. Construction and Building Materials, 221, 514-526.
[5] Podolsky, Z., Liu, J., Dinh, H., Doh, J. H., Guerrieri, M., ‌and Fragomeni, S. (2021). State of the art on the application of waste materials in geopolymer concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00637.
[6] www.steelradar.com, (2023). news. [online] Available at: https://www.steelradar.com/en/haber/iran-has-recorded-88-increase-in-iron-ore-production-in-the-last-6-years/ [17.05.2023].
[8] Mayes, W. M., Burke, I. T., Gomes, H. I., Anton, Á. D., Molnár, M., Feigl, V., ‌and Ujaczki, É. (2016). Advances in understanding environmental risks of red mud after the Ajka spill, Hungary. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 2, 332-343.
[9] Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymers: inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis and calorimetry, 37(8), 1633-1656.
[10] Reddy, M. S., Dinakar, P., ‌and Rao, B. H. (2016). A review of the influence of source material’s oxide composition on the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 234, 12-23.
[11] Qaidi, S. M., Tayeh, B. A., Isleem, H. F., de Azevedo, A. R., Ahmed, H. U., ‌and Emad, W. (2022). Sustainable utilization of red mud waste (bauxite residue) and slag for the production of geopolymer composites: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00994.
[12] Heath, A., Paine, K., Goodhew, S., Ramage, M., ‌and Lawrence, M. (2013). The potential for using geopolymer concrete in the UK. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials, 166(4), 195-203.
[13] Zhang, P., Gao, Z., Wang, J., Guo, J., Hu, S., and Ling, Y. (2020). Properties of fresh and hardened fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122389.
[14] Zhang, P., Zheng, Y., Wang, K., and Zhang, J. (2018). A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar. Composites Part B: Engineering, 152, 79-95.
[15] Huseien, G. F., Mirza, J., Ismail, M., Ghoshal, S. K., and Hussein, A. A. (2017). Geopolymer mortars as sustainable repair material: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 54-74.
[16] Li, Z., You, H., Gao, Y., Wang, C., and Zhang, J. (2021). Effect of ultrafine red mud on the workability and microstructure of blast furnace slag-red mud based geopolymeric grouts. Powder Technology, 392, 610-618.
[17] Zakira, U., Zheng, K., Xie, N., and Birgisson, B. (2023). Development of high-strength geopolymers from red mud and blast furnace slag. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135439.
[18] Tian, K., Wang, Y., Dong, B., Fang, G., and Xing, F. (2022). Engineering and Micro-properties of alkali-activated slag pastes with Bayer red Mud. Construction and Building Materials, 351, 128869.
[19] Liang, X., & Ji, Y. (2021). Experimental study on durability of red mud-blast furnace slag geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 267, 120942.
[20] Bayat, A., Hassani, A., & Yousefi, A. A. (2018). Effects of red mud on the properties of fresh and hardened alkali-activated slag paste and mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 167, 775-790.
[21] Mohseni, E. (2018). Assessment of Na2SiO3 to NaOH ratio impact on the performance of polypropylene fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 904-911.
[22] Pacheco-Torgal, F., Moura, D., Ding, Y., & Jalali, S. (2011). Composition, strength and workability of alkali-activated metakaolin based mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 25(9), 3732-3745.
[23] Luan, C., Shi, X., Zhang, K., Utashev, N., Yang, F., Dai, J., & Wang, Q. (2021). A mix design method of fly ash geopolymer concrete based on factors analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 272, 121612.
[24] Elyamany, H. E., Abd Elmoaty, M., & Elshaboury, A. M. (2018). Setting time and 7-day strength of geopolymer mortar with various binders. Construction and Building Materials, 187, 974-983.
[25] Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A., & van Deventer, J. S. (2007). Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of materials science, 42, 2917-2933.
[26] Provis, J. L., & Van Deventer, J. S. (Eds.). (2013). Alkali activated materials: state-of-the-art report, RILEM TC 224-AAM (Vol. 13). Springer Science & Business Media, Germany: Springer Netherlands, 388.
[27] Krizan, D., & Zivanovic, B. (2002). Effects of dosage and modulus of water glass on early hydration of alkali–slag cements. Cement and concrete research, 32(8), 1181-1188.
[28] Rattanasak, U., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2009). Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis of fly ash geopolymer. Minerals Engineering, 22(12), 1073-1078.
[29] Yang, K. H., Song, J. K., Ashour, A. F., & Lee, E. T. (2008). Properties of cementless mortars activated by sodium silicate. Construction and building materials, 22(9), 1981-1989.
[30] Sofi, M., Van Deventer, J. S. J., Mendis, P. A., & Lukey, G. C. (2007). Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). Cement and concrete research, 37(2), 251-257.
[31] Mastali, M., Kinnunen, P., Dalvand, A., Firouz, R. M., & Illikainen, M. (2018). Drying shrinkage in alkali-activated binders–a critical review. Construction and Building Materials, 190, 533-550.
[32] Ou, Z., Feng, R., Li, F., Liu, G., & Li, N. (2022). Development of drying shrinkage model for alkali-activated slag concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 323, 126556.
[33] Collins, F., & Sanjayan, J. G. (2000). Effect of pore size distribution on drying shrinking of alkali-activated slag concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(9), 1401-1406.
[34] Chen, S., Ruan, S., Zeng, Q., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Tian, Y., & Yan, D. (2022). Pore structure of geopolymer materials and its correlations to engineering properties: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 328, 127064.
[35] He, P., Wang, M., Fu, S., Jia, D., Yan, S., Yuan, J., and Zhou, Y. (2016). Effects of Si/Al ratio on the structure and properties of metakaolin based geopolymer. Ceramics international, 42(13), 14416-14422.

  • Receive Date 29 September 2023
  • Revise Date 11 December 2023
  • Accept Date 04 January 2024