Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Applying the ISM method to analyze the relationships between the key criteria for the pre-qualification of the green construction project contractor

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 1- PhD candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
3 Associate Professor,,ِ Department of Industrial Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
Abstract
One of the development infrastructures of every country is green projects, which have taken an important step in preserving the environment. The green construction project in Iran, like other countries of the world, is considered as one of the main infrastructures of development, and a huge part of the country's capital is allocated to construction projects as a symbol of economic growth and development. In this regard, when we want to step towards green building projects along with other countries to preserve the environment, many things should be considered. One of the most important things is choosing a contractor. The selection of the contractor usually includes two parts: pre-qualification and holding a tender. In the pre-qualification section of the contractor, a series of key criteria are considered in order to check the contractor's ability to implement the project, and the complex relationships between different key criteria should be specified so that the contractor can make the best choice based on the relationships. Therefore, in order to analyze the relationship between the key pre-qualification criteria for selecting a green construction contractor, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) has been used in this research. The current research is a descriptive survey in terms of practical purpose and data collection. For this purpose, first the key criteria were identified based on the review of the research literature, the opinion of experts, and then, using ISM, the relationships between the key criteria were explained and presented in the form of an integrated model. Finally, by using MICMAC analysis, the types of variables were determined according to their influence and effectiveness on other variables. Finally, the results of the research show that the key criteria have high dependence and high guiding power, and any small change on these variables causes fundamental changes in the system.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Ali Yar, A., Rezaei Adriani, M., and Parsayan, Ava. (1400). the role of the contractor in the success factors of green building projects, the 6th International Conference on Construction, Architecture and Sustainable Green City, Hamedan.
[2] Estidama. (2010). The pearl rating system for Estidama building rating system design & construction. 1st ed. Abu Dhabi: UAE Department of Urban Planning and Municipalities.
[3] El-Sayegh, S. M., Basamji, M., Haj Ahmad, A., & Zarif, N. (2021). Key contractor selection criteria for green construction projects in the UAE. International Journal of Construction Management21(12), 1240-1250.‏
[4] Khodabandeh, A. (2015). Contractor selection for construction projects using fuzzy logic. M.Sc. dissertation. Technical and Engineering Department, Sajjad University of Technology.
[5] Naghizadeh Vardin, A., Ansari, R., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2023). Optimization of Contractor Selection Process in Iranian Law of Tenders Utilizing VIKOR Method (Case Study: Water Industries in East Azerbaijan Province). Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering53.1(110), 13-30. doi: 10.22034/jcee.2021.44996.2018
[6] Khoso, A. R., Yusof, A. M., Chen, Z. S., Skibniewski, M. J., Chin, K. S., Khahro, S. H., & Sohu, S. (2022). Comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art contractor selection models in construction environment-A critical review and future call. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences79, 101137.‏
[7] Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., & Harris, P. (2001). Multi‐criteria selection or lowest price? Investigation of UK construction clients' tender evaluation preferences. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.‏
[8] Hasnain, M., Thaheem, M. J., & Ullah, F. (2018). Best value contractor selection in road construction projects: ANP-based decision support system. International journal of civil engineering16, 695-714.‏
[9] Hashemi, H., Mousavi, S. M., Zavadskas, E. K., Chalekaee, A., & Turskis, Z. (2018). A new group decision model based on grey-intuitionistic fuzzy-ELECTRE and VIKOR for contractor assessment problem. Sustainability10(5), 1635.‏
[10] Ranaei Koroshlooei, H., Alimohammadloo, M., Mirghaderi, S. H., & Amini, M. (2018). A Framework for Evaluating Qualification and Selecting Contractor in the Process of Outsourcing the Creation and Maintenance of Green Space Projects Case Study: Shiraz Municipality. Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies1(1), 59-85.
[11] Acheamfour, V. K., Adjei-Kumi, T., & Kissi, E. (2023). Contractor selection: a review of qualification and pre-qualification systems. International Journal of Construction Management23(2), 338-348.‏
[12] Yu, V. F., Chiang, F. Y., Le, T. H. A., & Lin, S. W. (2022). Using the ISM Method to Analyze the Relationships between Various Contractor Prequalification Criteria. Applied Sciences12(8), 3726.‏
[13] Hatush, Z., & Skitmore, M. (1997). Criteria for contractor selection. Construction management & economics15(1), 19-38.‏
[14] Zavadskas, E. K., Liias, R., & Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi-attribute decision-making methods for assessment of quality in bridges and road construction: State-of-the-art surveys. The baltic journal of road and bridge engineering3(3), 152-160.‏
[15] Huang, W. H., Tserng, H. P., Liao, H. H., Yin, S. Y., Chen, P. C., & Lei, M. C. (2013). Contractor financial prequalification using simulation method based on cash flow model. Automation in Construction35, 254-262.‏
[16] Gurgun, A. P., & Koc, K. (2020). Contractor prequalification for green buildings—evidence from Turkey. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.‏
[17] Homsian Fahad, Mehrdad. (1401). Identifying and evaluating the factors influencing the selection of the contractor using the integration of the construction management perspective and multi-criteria decision-making methods. System and Productivity Engineering, 2(2(Summer 1401)), 105-121.
[18] Nair, A., & Jahan, A. (2023). Evaluation and Selection of Construction Contractors with a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. New Approaches in Civil Engineering7(1), 31-46. doi: 10.30469/jnace.2023.384556.1088
[19] Valipour, A., & Jamali, M. (2021). HYBRID SWARA-COPRAS METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS SELECTION: SOUTH ZAGROS COMPANY CASE STUDY. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering8(Special Issue 1), 251-274. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2020.202125.1951
[20] Koc, K., Ekmekcioglu, Ö., & Işık, Z. (2023). Developing a Hybrid Fuzzy Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Circular Contractor Selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management149(10), 04023095.‏
[21] Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M., & Falamarzi, M. H. (2022). Assessment of Construction Project Contractor Selection Success Factors considering Their Interconnections. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering26(9), 3677-3690.‏
[22] Alshamrani, O. S. D., Saleem, M., AlYousif, I. K., & Alluqmani, A. (2023). Development of a pre-qualification and selection framework for construction projects’ contractors in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering22(3), 1545-1563.‏
[24] Beljkas, Z., Prascevic, Z., Ivanisevic, N., Knezevic, M., & Cvetkovska, M. (2019). Application of fuzzy logic on selection of contractors for construction of high rise buildings. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 222, No. 1, p. 012021). IOP Publishing.‏
[25] Nazarian-Jashnabadi, J., Bonab, S. R., Haseli, G., Tomaskova, H., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2023). A dynamic expert system to increase patient satisfaction with an integrated approach of system dynamics, ISM, and ANP methods. Expert Systems with Applications234, 121010.‏
[26] Yu, V. F., Chiang, F. Y., Le, T. H. A., & Lin, S. W. (2022). Using the ISM Method to Analyze the Relationships between Various Contractor Prequalification Criteria. Applied Sciences12(8), 3726.‏
[27] Cheng, E. W., & Li, H. (2004). Contractor selection using the analytic network process. Construction management and Economics22(10), 1021-1032.‏
[28] Shen, L. Y., Li, Q. M., Drew, D., & Shen, Q. P. (2004). Awarding construction contracts on multicriteria basis in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management130(3), 385-393.‏
[29] Smith, R. D. (2005). The CM@ Risk Contractor: In the Driver's Seat of the CM@ Risk Team. AACE International Transactions, R41.‏
[30] Kog, F., & Yaman, H. (2016). A multi-agent systems-based contractor pre-qualification model. Engineering, construction and architectural management23(6), 709-726.‏
[31] San Cristóbal, J. R. (2012). Contractor selection using multicriteria decision-making methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management138(6), 751-758.‏
[32] Puri, D., & Tiwari, S. (2014). Evaluating the criteria for contractors’ selection and bid evaluation. International journal of engineering science invention3(7), 44-48.‏
[34] Fong, P. S. W., & Choi, S. K. Y. (2000). Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process. Construction management and economics18(5), 547-557.‏
[35] Dallasega, P., & Rauch, E. (2017). Sustainable construction supply chains through synchronized production planning and control in engineer-to-order enterprises. Sustainability9(10), 1888.‏
[36] Gan, X., Zuo, J., Ye, K., Skitmore, M., & Xiong, B. (2015). Why sustainable construction? Why not? An owner's perspective. Habitat international47, 61-68.‏
[37] Watt, D. J., Kayis, B., & Willey, K. (2009). Identifying key factors in the evaluation of tenders for projects and services. International journal of project management27(3), 250-260.‏
[38] Singh, D., & Tiong, R. L. (2006). Contractor selection criteria: investigation of opinions of Singapore construction practitioners. Journal of construction engineering and management132(9), 998-1008.‏
[39] Zou, X., & Moon, S. (2014). Hierarchical evaluation of on-site environmental performance to enhance a green construction operation. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems31(1), 5-23.‏

  • Receive Date 04 August 2023
  • Revise Date 23 October 2023
  • Accept Date 21 November 2023