Fragility curves for seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings with shape memory alloy in regular, torsional irregularity and extreme torsional irregularity

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. in Civil-Earthquake Engineering, University of ShahidBeheshti, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The design and construction of irregular buildings has always been the focus of attention due to the demand for a beautiful and unique structure. Furthermore, the use of Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) has expanded due to the improvement of the behavior of RC structures in the last decade. The main advantages of using this alloy are its super-elasticity and the reversibility of inelastic displacements of the structure. In this paper, the behavior of reinforced concrete structures with SMA alloy in regular, torsional irregularity and extreme torsional irregularity are investigated. The effect of using this alloy has been shown using fragility curves in different degrees of irregularities than conventional concrete structures. In this regard, the effects of memory-shaped alloys as longitudinal reinforcement in short-order, intermediate, and high-order structures with three different arrangements of longitudinal reinforcements have been investigated. Different types of reinforcement arrangements are the case of full Steel, the case of SMA at the plastic region of the beams and steel reinforcement in other regions and finally the case of SMA reinforcement over the entire length of the beams.Then, several increasing nonlinear dynamic analysis (IDA) were performed under the influence of the 10 selected accelerometers, and maximum drift of each analysis was obtained and the fragility curves were calculated in accordance with the HAZUS instruction for each structural case. The results indicate that the presence of memory alloy in irregular buildings will reduce the damaging effects of irregularities, including maximum drift and residual drift of the structure. This result suggests that the use of SMA alloy in torsional irregular and extreme torsional irregular buildings can reduce the structural damage caused by a possible severe earthquake.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Saiidi, M.S. and H. Wang. (2006). Exploratory study of seismic response of concrete columns with shape memory alloys reinforcement. ACI structural journal, 103(3).
[2] Alam, M.S., M. Youssef, and M. Nehdi. (2009). Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Struct Syst, 5(5), 565-585.
[3] Abdulridha, A., et al. (2013). Behavior and modeling of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete beams. Engineering Structures, 49, 893-904.
[4] Alam, M.S., M. Moni, and S. Tesfamariam. (2012). Seismic overstrength and ductility of concrete buildings reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy rebar. Engineering Structures, 34, 8-20.
[5] Rahimi, M., Naghipour, M., Shakrchizadeh, M., Rezapour, M., Hashemvand, A. (2014), "Laboratory and Computer Modeling of Mechanical Properties of Concrete Cylinders Commutated with Alloyed Memory Structures
[6] Omidian, P, (2017), Vulnerability of low-rise concrete buildings with intelligent memory alloys using fragility curves, Contemporary International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning
[7] Road, housing and Urban Development Research Center., (2014). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, standard No. 2800 (4th Edition). Tehran: BHRC publication No: S-253.(In Persian)
[8] Vazife, Sh, (2012), Seismic performance of irregular concrete structures with asymmetric backwardness in height, Master thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Faculty of Engineering.
[9] Moghadam, A. S. and Tso, W. K. (2000). “Push over analysis for asymmetric and set-back multistory building, in proceedings.” World Conference On Earthquake Engineering , 12th, Acopulco, PP. 1093.
[10] Hashemi, R, (2014), The effect of irregularities in height and plan on seismic behavior of regular concrete buildings, Master's thesis, Ministry of Science and Technology Research, University of Science and Culture, Faculty of Civil Engineering.
[11] Kilar,V.and Fajfar,P. (2002). “Simplified nonlinear seismic analysis of Asymmetric multistory building, in proceeding.” European Conference on Earthquake Engineering , 12th Upper Hutt, PP. 1093
[12] Omidian, P. and Saffari, H. (2017). Seismic vulnerability assessment of regular and irregular concrete structures using fragility curves. J. of Structural and Construction Engineering (JSCE).
[13] Cai C, Wenjie Wu, Suren C, Voyiadjis G. (2003) “Applications of smart materials in structural engineering”. Louisiana Transportation, Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
[14] Otsuka, K. and C.M. Wayman. (1999). Shape memory materials: Cambridge University Press
[15] Song, G., N. Ma, and H.-N. Li. (2006). Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures. Engineering Structures, 28(9), 1266-1274.
[16] Des roches.R, Delmont.M, Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using Shape memory Alloys. Engineering structers.2002, 325-332
[17] Graesser EJ, Cozzarelli FA. Shape Memory Alloys as new materials for aseismic Isolation Journal of Engineering Mechanicss 1991 AIME VOl, 189, 45-52
[18] Liang, C. and C. Rogers. (1990). One-dimensional thermomechanical constitutive relations for shape memory materials. Journal of intelligent material systems and structures, 1(2), 207-234.
[19] Ivshin, Y. and T.J. Pence. (1994). A thermomechanical model for a one variant shape memory material. Journal of intelligent material systems and structures, 5(4), 455-473.
[20] Bo, Z. and D.C. Lagoudas. (1999). Thermomechanical modeling of polycrystalline SMAs under cyclic loading, Part IV: Modeling of minor hysteresis loops. International Journal of Engineering Science, 37(9), 1205-1249.
[21] Auricchio, F. and E. Sacco. (1997). A superelastic shape-memory-alloy beam model. Journal of intelligent material systems and structures, 8(6), 489-501.
[22] Huang, M. and L. Brinson. (1998). A multivariant model for single crystal shape memory alloy behavior. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 46(8), 1379-1409.
[23] Goo, B. and C. Lexcellent. (1997). Micromechanics-based modeling of two-way memory effect of a single crystalline shape-memory alloy. ActaMaterialia, 45(2), 727-737.
[24] SeismoSoft (2013). SeismoStruct – A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures, (online): Available from URL: www.seismosoft.com
[25] HAZUS (1999).Earthquake loss estimation methodology-Technical manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Institute of Building Science.
[26] Alam M.S., Youssef M.A., Nehdi M. (2008), “Analytical prediction of seismic behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete elements”, Journal of Engineering Structures
[27] Ministry of road and urban development., (2013). Iranian National Building Code, Part 9: Design and Construction of Concrete buildings. Tehran: Nashre Tose’e. (In Persian)
[28] Vamvatiskos, D. and Cornell, C.A. "Incremental Dynamic Analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural dynamics,the Joun Blume Erathquake Engineering center,Report NO.151, 31(2002) 491-514.
[29] FEMA.-350, “Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings”, Prepared by SAC Joint Venture for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., (2000).
[30] FEMA-351, “Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings”, prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.,( 2000).
[31] Shome, N., Cornel, CA. (1999).Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
[32] FEMA, P.,695 (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Washington DC.
[33] Pacific Earthquake Engineering Reasearch center (PEER) online strong motion database, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html
[34] Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C.A. (2005). A vectorvalued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, p. 1193-1217.
[35] Jalayer, F. (2003). Direct Probabilistic Seismic Analysis: implementing non-linear dynamic assessments. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University