Investigate the effect of foundation and tank concrete hardness on the seismic response of high tanks using probabilistic analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 Associate professor, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

3 Graduated Master of Water Engineering and Hydraulic Structures, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Water tanks are among the main components of water supply networks for storing, maintaining and supplying pressure, and these structures should have the ability to exploit and supply pressure in the water supply network after the earthquake. In this paper, the effect of foundation concrete hardness to tank concrete hardness on seismic analysis of air tanks has been investigated. In the current seismic analysis, the relationship between the concrete hardness of the foundation and the concrete of the tank body is expressed by the definition of the constant coefficient K. By changing this coefficient, its effect on each of the tensile/compressive stress, and displacement parameters using a probabilistic analysis is examined. The tank is modeled using a three-dimensional finite element method based on ANSYS software. In this model, the interaction between the tank body, fluid and foundation are considered and the accelerogram of Manjil earthquake in the intended model is used to apply the earthquake. The probabilistic analysis used in this study is Monte Carlo simulator using the Latin hypercube sampling method and K coefficient is used as an input variable. The maximum horizontal displacement of the structure, the maximum 1st principle stress and the maximum 3rd principle stress are selected as critical responses and output variables. The results of analyzing models and comparing responses such as maximum principle stresses and maximum displacement show that with regard to economic considerations and the appropriate reliability coefficient for the system, the most efficient and optimal value for the coefficient K is approximately 0.7.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Omidinasab, F., & Shakib, H. (2012). Seismic response evaluation of the RC elevated water tank with fluid-structure interaction and earthquake ensemble. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(3), 366-376. [2] Hoskins, L. M., & Jacobsen, L. S. (1934). Water pressure in a tank caused by a simulated earthquake. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 24(1), 1-32. [3] Jacobsen, L. S. (1949). Impulsive hydrodynamics of fluid inside a cylindrical tank and of fluid surrounding a cylindrical pier. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 39(3), 189-204. [4] Housner, G. W. (1963). The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 53(2), 381-387. [5] Haroun, M. A., & Ellaithy, H. M. (1985). Seismically induced fluid forces on elevated tanks. Journal of Technical Topics in Civil Engineering, 111(1), 1-15. [6] Shrimali, M. K., & Jangid, R. S. (2002). Seismic response of liquid storage tanks isolated by sliding bearings. Engineering Structures, 24(7), 909-921. [7] Dutta, S., Mandal, A., & Dutta, S. C. (2004). Soil–structure interaction in dynamic behaviour of elevated tanks with alternate frame staging configurations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 277(4-5), 825-853. [8] Livaoglu, R., & Dogangun, A. (2005). Seismic evaluation of fluid-elevated tank-foundation/soil systems in frequency domain. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 21(1), 101-119. [9] Chen, J. Z., & Kianoush, M. R. (2005). Seismic response of concrete rectangular tanks for liquid containing structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32(4), 739-752. [10] Kianoush, M. R., & Chen, J. Z. (2006). Effect of vertical acceleration on response of concrete rectangular liquid storage tanks. Engineering structures, 28(5), 704-715.
[11] Sweedan, A. M. (2009). Equivalent mechanical model for seismic forces in combined tanks subjected to vertical earthquake excitation. Thin-Walled Structures, 47(8), 942-952 [12] Shekari, M. R., Khaji, N., & Ahmadi, M. T. (2009). A coupled BE–FE study for evaluation of seismically isolated cylindrical liquid storage tanks considering fluid–structure interaction. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 25(3), 567-585. [13] Ghaemmaghami, A. R., & Kianoush, M. R. (2010). Effect of wall flexibility on dynamic response of concrete rectangular liquid storage tanks under horizontal and vertical ground motions. Journal of structural engineering, 136(4), 441-451. [14] Shakib, H., Omidinasab, F., & Ahmadi, M. T. (2010). Seismic demand evaluation of elevated reinforced concrete water tanks. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(3), 204-220.
[15] Altarejos-García, L., Escuder-Bueno, I., Serrano-Lombillo, A., & de Membrillera-Ortuño, M. G. (2012). Methodology for estimating the probability of failure by sliding in concrete gravity dams in the context of risk analysis. Structural safety,-36, 1-13. [16] Khiavi, M. P. (2016). Investigation of the effect of reservoir bottom absorption on seismic performance of concrete gravity dams using sensitivity analysis. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(5), 1977-1986. [17] Cardoso, J. B., de Almeida, J. R., Dias, J. M., & Coelho, P. G. (2008). Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks. Advances in Engineering Software, 39(6), 505-513. [18] Wolf, J. (1985). Dynamic soil-structure interaction. Prentice Hall international series in civil engineering and engineering mechanics, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, Ne Jersey 07632. [19] Ansys User Manual. (2007). Release 11.0 Documentation for ANSYS. SASIP, Inc. [20] Raphael, J. M. (1984). Tensile strength of concrete. ACI Journal, 81(2), 158-165.
Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 3 - Serial Number 26
November 2019
Pages 89-104

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 January 2018
  • Revise Date: 28 March 2018
  • Accept Date: 10 May 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics