Behaviour Verification of Gas Transfer Buried Steel Pipelines by Propagation of Seismic Waves in Soil Types

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Asistant Prof., Faculty of Engineering., University of Zanjan

2 university of zanjan

3 M.Sc. of Structure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering., University of Zanjan

4 Asistant Prof., Structure Eng. Dept., Faculty of Civil Eng., Shahid Beheshti Modares University

Abstract

The most important parameter for determining the level of performance and breakdown of buried pipes in the case of earthquake is the maximum value of strain. Vital arteries code, while studying the maximum value of strain, have addressed the seismic behavior of buried pipelines. Static methods don’t have the ability to consider the transient strain effect in their results, so it is necessary to consider another method in determining maximum strain. From the suggested methods to determine the maximum strain in buried pipes during earthquake is nonlinear dynamic analysis of pipes and the soil around it. In this study, using Abaqus software, we have presented a method to calculate the maximum strain of buried steel pipes for gas transfer in soil according to the parameters including earthquake energy like Arias intensity and Housner spectral intensity and using accelerograms. Analyses performed according to dynamic method is nonlinear and modeling has been done for three different lengths of gas transfer buried steel pipes in soil, with the internal pressure using different accelerograms for types of soil in Iran 2800 code. Then, in order to present a united relation to show the relationship between maximum strain of steel pipes and parameters including earthquake energy, in order to apply the considered relation for buried pipes with different lengths and different soils, we have used T/L parameter and the values of a and b (coefficients of fitted diagrams) in each section is expressed according to this parameter

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] PoorArbabi,A. (1388) Buried pipelines and influence of earthquake. The third National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. (in Persian)
[2] Michael, J. (2000) Earthquake engineering handbook (Buried Pipelines), Hawaii University.
[3] Eguchi, R. (1991) Seismic hazard input for lifeline systems, Structural Safety 10, 193-198.
[4] O’Rourke, M., Ayala, G. (1993) Pipeline damage due to wave propagation, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1490-1498.
[5] Jeon, S., O’Rourke, T. (2005) Northridge Earthquake Effects on Pipelines and Residential Buildings, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 294-318.
[6] Abbasi, R. (1389) The relationship between spectral intensity with maximum strain of steel buried pipes, master thesis, University of Water and Power, Tehran. (in Persian)
[7] American Lifeline Alliances, (2005) Guidelines for design of buried steel pipes, American society of civil engineering, New York.
[8] Hassani, N., shadabfar, M. (2013) Effects of Crossing Angle on the Behavior of Buried Steel Pipelines Crossing Fault, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 630-636.
[9] IITK-GSDM, (2007) Guidelines for Seismic Design of Buried Pipelines, Indian institute of technology Kanpur.
988 نشریه علمی – پژوهشی مهندسی سازه و ساخت، دوره 6، شماره 2، سال 9318 ، صفحه 911 تا 910
[10] Alamation, E. Ghadamkhyr, K. Karimpour, B. (2013) Investigation Depth of Buried Pipeline on Stress, International Symposium on Advances in Science and Technology, 7th SASTech.
[11] Barenberg, M. (1988) Correlation of pipeline damage with ground motions, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 706-711.
[12] Eguchi, R. (1983) Seismic vulnerability models for underground pipes, Int. Symp. on Earthquake Behavior and Safety of Oil and Gas Storage Facilities, Buried Pipelines and Equipment; American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 368-373.
[13] Porter, K. Scawthorn, C. Honegger, D. O’Rourke, T. Blackburn, F. (1991) Performance of water supply pipelines in liquefied soil, 4th U.S–Japan Workshop on Earthquake Disaster Prevention for Lifeline Systems Gaithersburg, NIST Special Publication 840, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 3-17.