Seismic response of cable stayed bridges under multi support excitation

ُُShiravand, Mahmoud Reza; Parvanehro, Parsa; Bagheri, Sina

doi:10.22065/jsce.2017.87901.1216

Seismic response of cable stayed bridges under multi support excitation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mahmoud Reza ُُShiravand ¹

Parsa Parvanehro ²

Sina Bagheri ³

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

² PhD student in Earthquake Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

³ MSc of Earthquake Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

10.22065/jsce.2017.87901.1216

Abstract

In this Study, the seismic response of cable stayed bridges have been evaluated under multi-support excitations. There are three sources that cause the earthquake wave characteristics change during its propagation path. Local site effect, loss of coherency and wave passage effect are three sources of spatial variation of seismic ground motions. In long span structures, such as cable supported bridges, this phenomenon is more evident and traditional analyzing (uniform excitation) may not be valid and be conservative. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the response of cable stayed bridges under non-uniform excitations. For this purpose, the non-uniform time histories were artificially generated using Kriging method based on a set of known time history in the west support of bridge. Nonlinear time history analysis was performed and cables axial force, deck moment, pylons moment and finally drift ratio of bridge have been examined in order to investigate how non-uniform excitation change the seismic response of bridge compared with uniform excitations. Results show non-uniform excitation in some bridge components increase responses and decreases in the others. In non-uniform excitation, although total time history energy is lesser than uniform excitation, it can significantly change the distribution of the forces and makes differential displacement between cables supports and increase the possibility of failure.

Keywords

Multi-Support Excitation

Cable stayed bridge

Kriging method

Spatial Variation of Ground Motion

Earthquake

Subjects

Bridge Engineering

[1] Zerva, A. (2002). Spatial variation of seismic ground motion: An overview. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 55(3), 271-297.

[2] Bayrak, O. (1996). Effect of Multiple Seismic Input on The Response of Long Multi-Span Bridges. In: 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE). Acapulco: Oxford Elsevier Science , 523.

[3] Bogdanoff, J., Goldberg, J., Schiff, A. (1967). The Effect of Ground Transmission Time on The Response of Long Structures, bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 55 (3), 627-640.

[4] Dumanoglu, A. and Soyluk, K. (2003). A Stochastic Analysis of Long Span Structures Subjected to Spatially Varying Ground Motions Including The Site-Response Effect. International Journal of Engineering Structure, 25 (10), 1301-1310.

[5] Saxena, V., Deodatis, G., Shinozuka, M. (2000). Effect of Spatial Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion on The Non-Linear Dynamic Response of Highway Bridges. In: 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE). Auckland: New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering. 2227.

[6] Soyluk, K. (2004). Comparison of Random Vibration Methods for Multi-Support Seismic Excitation of Long-Span Bridges. International Journal of Engineering Structure, 26 (9) .1573-1583.

[7] Wang, J. (2003). Analysis of the seismic response of highway bridges to multiple support excitations. Ph.D thesis. University of Canterbury, Department of Civil Engineering.

[8] Berrah, M and Kausel, E. (1993). A modal combination rule for spatially varying seismic motions. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 22(9). 791–800.

[9] Der Kiureghian A., Keshishian P., and Hakobian, A. (1997). Multiple support response spectrum analysis of bridges including the site response effect and the MSRS code, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. UCB/EERC-97/02, University of California, Berkeley.

[10] Der Kiureghian, A, and Neuenhofer, A. (1992). Response spectrum method for multiple support seismic excitation. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics. 21 (8), 713–740.

[11] Zerva, A. (1992). Seismic loads predicted by spatial variability models. Structural. Safety.11(3-4), 227–243.

[12] Krige, D. (1966).Two-Dimensional Weighted Moving Average Trend Surfaces for Ore Valuation. Journal of

South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 13-38.

[13] Journel, A. and Huijbregts, C. (1978). Mining Geostatistics, London: Academic Press, 159-215.