Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Effective criteria in the seismic performance of squat shear walls

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant Professor, dept. of civil engineering, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract
Squat walls are very common in low-rise construction and at lower levels of tall buildings (e.g., parking level walls or basement walls). They can be also found in long walls with perforations due to window and door openings, resulting in wall segments between openings. They show significant amount of shear deformation as compared to bending deformation. Shear strength usually governs the design of such walls. In the modeling of these walls, these elements are modeled as members with bending behavior, while squat shear walls have shear behavior, and paying attention to the bending and shear interaction in these walls, increases the modeling accuracy. In this research, while considering the interaction of bending and shear behavior in the modeling of squat shear walls, the effect of various factors in the behavior of these walls was investigated such as wall aspect ratio, axial load, vertical and horizontal reinforcement ratio, boundary elements effect, reinforcement concentration in the boundary element. In this study finite element software Opensees and nonlinear static analysis method are used. The results of the investigation show that decreasing the wall aspect ratio, the shear strength and stiffness of the wall increase, but its ductility decreases. The presence of axial load and boundary elements increases the shear strength and the percentage of energy absorption. The concentration of reinforcement in the boundary element increases the shear strength, the yield surface and the percentage of energy absorption. In general, by predicting the appropriate conditions of the wall, including the appropriate aspect ratio and the sufficient percentage of the reinforcement and predicting the boundary elements, it is possible to increase the ductility, stiffness and shear resistance of these walls.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Ghanizadeh, M., Sarvghad Moghadam, A., Farzam, M. (2016). Effect of the reinforcement patterns on the seismic performance of the short shear walls, Journal of Modeling in Engineering, 14(45), 79-92.
[2] Ghanizadeh, M., Sarvghad Moghadam, A., Farzam, M. (2017). Effect of the axial force and material strength on the seismic behavior of the short shear walls, Journal of Modeling in Engineering ,15(48), 125-137.
[3] Ghanizadeh, M., Farzam, M., Sarvghad Moghadam, A., (2017). Evaluation of Effective Parameters on Behavior of Shallow RC Shear Walls Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. Modares Civil Engineering Journal, 17(3), 89-101.
[4] Al-Bayati A. F.; (2023). Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Squat Walls. Civil Engineering Journal, 9(2), 273-304.
[5] Jin Ch.; Su Y. ; Pan Z. ; Meng Sh. (2023) Experimental Study and Finite Element Modelling of Squat Shear Walls under Combined Cyclic Loads and High Axial Loads. Buildings, 13(8), 2104.
[6] Sivaguru V. (2020). Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Squat Shear Walls with and without Openings. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai-600036.
[7] Gao, X. ,  Xu, Z. , Ren, X. , Li, J., (2024). Experimental analysis of RC and SPRC squat shear walls, Journal of Building Engineering,93, 109861
[8] Adorno-Bonilla, C., Vidot-Vega, A., (2015). Shear Strength of Squat Reinforced Concrete Walls under Cyclic Loading, The 11th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Victoria, BC, Canada, July 21 – 24.
[9] Pachideh, Gh., Gholhaki, M., Yadegari, A., Shiri, M., (2016). Modeling and Analysis of Thin Steel Plate Shear Walls Using the New Method, 2nd international conference on civil engineering, architecture & urban planning elites, London, United Kingdom.
[10] Gholhaki, M., Pachideh, Gh., Javahertarash, A., (2020). Capacity spectrum of SPSW using pushover and energy method without need for calculation of target point, Structures, 26, 516-523
[11] Gholhaki, M.,  Karimi, M., Pachideh, Gh., (2019). Investigation of Subpanel Size Effect on Behavior Factor of Stiffened Steel Plate Shear Wall, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 5 (4), 73-87.
[12] Gholhaki, M., Pachideh, Gh., Rezayfar, O., ghazvini, S., (2019). Specification of Response modification factor for Steel Plate Shear Wall by Incremental Dynamic Analysis Method [IDA], Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 6 (2), 211-224.
[13] Ashrafi, H.R., Beiranvand, P., Pouraminian, M., Moayeri, M.S., (2018). Examining the impact of sheet placement and changes in waves characteristics on behavior of wavy steel shear wall, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 9.
[14] Mazzoni, S. (2006). Opensees Command Language Manual, http://Opensees.Berkeley.edu.
[15] Kuang J. S., Ho,Y. B. (2008). Seismic behavior and ductility of squat reinforced concrete shear walls with nonseismic detailing. ACI Structural Journal, 105(2), 225-231.
[16] Medhekar, M., S., Jain ,S. K. (1993). Seismic behavior,design and detailing of RC shear walls, Part I: Behavior and strength. The Indian Concrete Journal.
[17] Taucer F.F., Spacone E., Filippou F.C. (1991). A Fiber Beam-Column Element for Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Report UCB/EERC-91/17.
[18] Orakcal, K., Massone, L.M., Wallace, J.W. (2006). Analytical Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Walls for Predicting Flexural and Coupled–Shear-Flexural Responses, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Los Angeles, Report PEER 2006/07.
Volume 12, Issue 06 - Serial Number 95
September 2025
Pages 240-257

  • Receive Date 04 October 2024
  • Revise Date 05 December 2024
  • Accept Date 13 December 2024