Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Identifying and compiling effective factors on the efficiency of construction projects in sports

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Samaneh Bakhshimoghaddam 1
Mohammad Reza Esmaeilzadeh Ghandehari 2
Hossein Peymanizad 2
Hassan Fahim Devin 2
1 PhD student of physical education department,,, Mashhad branch Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran
2 Associate professor of physical education department,, , Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashad, Iran
10.22065/jsce.2024.455304.3403
Abstract
The present research was conducted in a combined and survey method. The population in the qualitative part included some elites with the criterion of having experience in the field of construction projects, and in the quantitative part it included some university faculty members, managers and experts related to the subject. In the qualitative section, 19 people were interviewed using the purposeful and snowball sampling method until the content was saturated. In the following, after setting up the list, 58 people who were willing to cooperate were selected. In the qualitative part, the data theory of Strauss-Corbin's approach was used to analyze qualitative data, and in the quantitative part, structural equation modeling was used using SmartPLS version 3 software. In the qualitative section, a total of 26 factors and 173 items were identified as effective factors in the efficiency of construction projects in sports. Also, in the quantitative part, the path coefficient findings showed that all paths are positive and significant. Causal, contextual and intervening conditions are significant with direct effect coefficients of 0.262, 0.354 and 0.401 on the main outcome of the research, which is the efficiency of sports construction projects in the country. This means that all 3 factors have a positive and significant role in the main phenomenon of the research. In addition to, the main result for the strategies with the standard effect coefficient of 0.858 is significant and strong. This finding shows that the identified strategies lead to the efficiency of sports construction projects in the country. Finally, the path of the strategies to the outcome was significant with a standard effect coefficient of 0.848 and had a strong intensity, which shows that if the strategies are implemented, the identified consequences can be expected in the direction of the efficiency of the country's sports construction projects.
Keywords
"؛ Efficiency model"؛ Construction project"؛ Sports project"؛ Effective factors"؛
"؛ Grounded theory"

Subjects

1. Lee, D & Wilson, A (2021). Optimizing resources for sports construction projects: A project management approach. Construction Management and Economics, Volume 20, Issue 4. 15-22.
2. Ahmed, A. M., Sayed, W., Asran, A., & Nosier, I. (2023). Identifying barriers to the implementation and development of sustainable construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(8), 1277-1288.‏
3. Ghorbani sa, H. (2023). construction projects based on safety, health and environmental criteria(HSE). Civil and Project, 5(6), 58-68. doi: 10.22034/cpj.2023.419956.1224
4. Ebrahimi, F., ghaedi, A., sjadihazave, S. H., & nikaeen, Z. (2023). Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Delay Modeling of Sports Construction Projects. Sport Management Studies, . doi: 10.22089/smrj.2023.13983.3802
5. Schulenkorf, N., & Siefken, K. (2019). Managing sport-for-development and healthy lifestyles: The sport-for-health model. Sport Management Review, 22(1), 96-107.‏
6. Tariq, J., & Gardezi, S. S. S. (2023). Study the delays and conflicts for construction projects and their mutual relationship: A review. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(1), 101815.‏
7. Abroshan, H. (2021). Factors affecting the increase in costs in municipal civil engineering projects. Journal of new research approachs in management and accounting. 5(17), 283-301
8. Soltanhoseini, M., Salimi, M., & Tayebi, M. (2021). Analyzing the key success factors behind of the construction of the sports facilities projects (Case study: The Sports Complex of Naghsh-e-Jahan in Isfahan). Sport Management Studies, 13(66), 171-206. doi: 10.22089/smrj.2019.7170.2509
9. Glaser, J. (2004). Management's role in IT project failures. Healthcare Financial Management, 21(2), 90-92.
10. Jafari, E. (2010). Investigating the reasons for the delay of sports construction projects in the country, Degree of master, North of Amol, physical education college.
11. Moshkelgosha, E., & Hesami, M. (2022). Designing a model for the development of sports development projects in the country. Sport Management Studies, 14(75), 343-366. doi: 10.22089/smrj.2022.12149.3590
12. Zidane, Y. J. T., & Olsson, N. O. (2017). Defining project efficiency, effectiveness and efficacy. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(3), 621-641.‏
13. Khodrooyesi, Solimani, Afkar, & Adel. (2023). Design and testing of a collective financing model for national sports projects. Knowledge management in sports.
14. Müller-Frączek, I. (2021). Sports infrastructure vs. sport development in Poland. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21, 1014-1020.‏
15. Firooznafezi, A. (2020). Civil Engineering Project Management, first edition, Tehran, Dibadokht publisher
16. Kruszyńska, E., &Poczta, J. (2019). Hierarchy of factors affecting the condition and development of sports and recreation infrastructure—Impact on the recreational activity and health of the residents of a city (Poznan case study). International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(4), 556.‏
17. Ebrahimi, F., Nikaeen, Z., & Sadjadi Hezaveh, S. H. (2022). Factors Affecting the Delays in Sports Construction Projects by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 20(54), 305-318. doi: 10.22034/ssys.2022.487
18. Brownlow, Louis. "Woodrow Wilson and Public Administration." Jstor. American Society for Public Administration, n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2015.
19. Smith, J&Johnson, E (2022). Enhancing efficiency in sports construction projects through sustainable practices. International Journal of Sustainable Construction, Volume 12, Issue 3, 10-18.
20. Brown,S&Clark, M (2023). Efficiency and innovation in sports construction: A case study of stadium development. Journal of Sports Facility Management, Volume 8, Issue 2, 35-46.
21. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Adb, H, Selukdar, A, and Sardari Rad, A. (2015). Investigating influential factors in strategic project management based on the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) in Sabir Company. International Conference on Management and Economics in the 21st Century. Tehran. 433-454. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/855272/fa
23. K‌h‌a‌z‌a‌e‌n‌i, G., Khanzadi, M., & Afshar, A. (2012). I‌D‌E‌A‌L S‌U‌C‌C‌E‌S‌S E‌V‌A‌L‌U‌A‌T‌I‌O‌N O‌F M‌U‌L‌T‌I O‌B‌J‌E‌C‌T‌I‌V‌E M‌O‌D‌E‌L F‌O‌R B‌O‌T P‌R‌O‌J‌E‌C‌T‌S; S‌T‌R‌U‌C‌T‌U‌R‌E A‌N‌D \r\nA‌P‌P‌L‌I‌C‌A‌T‌I‌O‌N. Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 2-28(2), 45-55.
24. Yang, J. (2021). Evaluation of Large-Scale Sports Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process, Hindawi, Mobile Information Systems, Volume 2021, Article ID 9962167, 10
25. Kimotho, J. Yusuf, M. Nyang’au, S. (2023). PROJECT COST ESTIMATION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPORTS STADIA CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN KENYA, Vol 5, Issue 3, pp 13-25, Dec 6, 2023, © International Research Journal Publishers, ISSN 2710-2742 (online) www.irjp.org

  • Receive Date 25 August 2024
  • Revise Date 27 October 2024
  • Accept Date 04 December 2024