[1] AISC 358–16 (2016), Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
[2] Wilkinson, Sean, Hurdman, Gordon, Crowther, Adrian (2006). A moment resisting connection for earthquake resistant structures. J Constr Steel Res, 62(3), 295–302.
[3] Mirghaderi, Seyed Rasoul, Torabian, Shahabeddin,Ali Imanpour (2010). Seismic performance of the Accordion-Web RBS connection. J Constr Steel Res, 66, 277-288.
[4] Hedayat, Amir Ahmad, Saffari, Hamed, Hadi, Amid (2011). Behaviour of steel reduced beam web (RBW) connections with drilled voids, 5th SASTech, Khavaran Higher-education Institute, Mashhad, Iran.
[5] Vetr, Mohammad Ghasem, Miri, M., Haddad, A. (2012). Seismic Behavior of a New Reduced Beam Section Connection by Drilled Holes Arrangement (RBS_DHA) on the Beam Flanges through Experimental Studies, 15WCEE.
[6] Chen, Cheng-Chih, Lin, Chun-Chou (2013). Seismic performance of steel beam-to-column moment connections with tapered beam flanges. J Struct Eng, 48, 588-601.
[7] Sofias, C.E., Kalfas, C.N., Pachoumis, D.T. (2014), Experimental and FEM analysis of reduced beam section moment endplate connections under cyclic loading. J Struct Eng, 59, 320-329.
[8] Morrison, Machel, Schweizer, TasnimHassan, Doug (2015). An innovative seismic performance enhancement technique for steel building moment resisting connections. J Constr. Steel Res, 109, 34-46.
[9] Tahamouli Roudsari, M, Jamshidi, K. H, Mohebi Zangeneh, M. (2016). Experimental and numerical investigation of IPE reduced beam sections with diagonal web stiffeners. J Earthq Eng, 22(4), 533-552.
[10] Morshedi, Mohamad A, Dolatshahi, Kiarash M, Maleki, Shervin (2017). Double reduced beam section connection. J Constr Steel Res, 138, 283–297.
[11] Roudsari Tahamouli, M, Jamshidi, H, Moradi, SH. (2018). Experimental and numerical assessment of reduced IPE beam sections connections with box-stiffener. Int J Steel Struct, 18(1), 255–263.
[12] Shen, Y., Christopoulos, C., Mansour, N. and Tremblay, R. (2011), Seismic Design and Performance of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames with Nonlinear Replaceable Links, J. Struct. Eng., 137, 1107-1117.
[13] He, H., Chen, K. and Li, R. (2015), Seismic Performances of Replaceable Steel Connection with Low Yield Point Metal. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015 , 1-11.
[14] He, X., Chen, Y., Eatherton, R and Shao, T. (2018), Experimental Evaluation of Replaceable Energy Dissipation Connection for Moment-Resisting Composite Steel Frames. J. Struct. Eng., 144(6), 04018042 (1-14).
[15] Soltanabadi, R., Behnamfar, F. (2018), Experimental Studies on a Combined Damper for Repairable Steel Moment Connections, International Journal of Steel Structures, 18(1), 211-224.
[16] Garoosi, A. R., Tahamouliroudsari, M., Hosseini Hashemi, B. (2018). Experimental evaluation of rigid connection with reduced section and replaceable fuse, Structures, 16, 390–404.
[17] Richard, P. (2019), A Repairable Connection for Earthquake-Resisting Moment Frames, The 14th Nordic Steel Construction Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
[18] Kanyilmaz, A., Muhaxheri, M. and Castiglioni, C. A. (2019), Influence of repairable bolted dissipative beam splices (structural fuses) on reducing the seismic vulnerability of steel-concrete composite frames, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 119, 281–298.
[19] Wang, M., Dong, K. and Liu, M. (2020), Damage control mechanism and seismic performance of a steel moment connection with replaceable low-yield-point steel double T-stub fuses, Thin–Walled Structures, 157, 107143.
[20] Wang, M., Zhang, Ch., Sun, Y. and Dong, K., (2022), Seismic performance of steel frame with replaceable low yield point steel connection components and the effect of structural fuses, J. Building Engineering, 47, 103862.
[21] Zhang, H., Su, M., Lian, M., Cheng, Q., Guan, B. and Gong, H. (2020), Experimental and numerical study on the seismic behavior of high-strength steel framed-tube structures with end-plate-connected replaceable shear links, Engineering Structures, 223, 111172.
[22] Lan, T., Li, R., Jiang, Z., Zhang, H. and Wang, H. W. (2020), Experimental study of earthquake-resilient prefabricated opening-web steel channel beam-column joint with double FCPs, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 175, 106356.
[23] Ozkılıç, Y. (2020), A new replaceable fuse for moment resisting frames: Replaceable bolted reduced beam section connections, Steel and Composite Structure, 35, 353-370.
[24] Ozkılıç, Y. and Topkaya, C. (2021), Extended end-plate connections for replaceable shear links. Engineering Structure, 240, 112385.
[25] Lu, Y., Basha, S. H. and Liu, Y. (2022), Performance of steel beams with replaceable buckling restrained fuses under cyclic loading, J. construction Steel Research, 194, 107310.
[26] Gowda, Ch., Kakade, A. and Swamy, R. (2022), Influence of Section Properties of Replaceable Links on Energy Dissipation of Cantilever Steel Beam, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 7(1), 5299-5305.
[27] Hu, G., Haung, W. and Xie, H. (2020), Mechanical behavior of a replaceable energy dissipation device for precast concrete beam-column connections, J. Constructional Steel Research, 164, 105816.
[28] Li, Y., Geng, F., Ding, Y. and Wang, L. (2020), Experimental and numerical study of low-damage self-centering precast concrete frame connections with replaceable dampers, Engineering Structure, 220, 111011.
[29] Bai, J., He, J., Li, Ch., Jin, Sh., and Yang, H. (2022), An RBS-based replaceable precast concrete beam-column joint: Design approach and experimental investigation, J. Building Engineering, 51, 104212.
[30] Sofias, CE, Kalfas, CN, Pachoumis, DT (2013), Experimental & FEM Analysis of Reduced Beam Section Moment End Plate Connections Under Cyclic Loading, J Eng. Structure, 320-329.
[31] AISC (2002), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
[32] Lee CH, Sang-Woo J, Jin-Ho K, Chia-Ming U. (2005). Effects of panel zone strength and beam web connection method on seismic performance of reduced beam section steel moment connections. J. Structural Engineering, 131, 1854–65.
[33] FEMA (2000a), Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Report No. FEMA-350, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
[34] Mashaly Elsayed, El-Heweity Mohamed, Abou-Elfath Hamdy (2011). Osman Mohamed. Behavior of four-bolt extended end-plate connection subjected to lateral loading. Alex Eng J.,50(1), 79–90.
[35] Montuori R. (2014). The influence of gravity loads on the seismic design of RBS connec- tions. Open Constr Build Technol J, 8(1), 248–261.
[36] Abdollahzadeh, Gholamreza, Hashemi, Seyed, Tavakoli, Hamidreza, Rahami, Hosein (2014), Determination of hysteretic behavior of steel end-plate beam-to-column connection with mechanical and neural network modeling. Arab J Sci Eng. 39(11), 7661–7671.
[37] Grimsmo, EL, Clausen, AH, Langseth, M, Aalberg A. (2015). An experimental study of static and dynamic behaviour of bolted end-plate joints of steel. Int J Impact Eng., 85, 132–145.
[38] Oh, K, Lee, K, Chen, L, Hong, SB, Yang, Y. (2015), Seismic performance evaluation of weak axis column-tree moment connections with reduced beam section. J Constr. Steel Res., 105, 28–38.
[39] Kafi, M., Tarighi, P. (2017), Evaluation of Using Triangular Plates as Continuity Plates in Box Column Section in Prequalified Welded Connections under Cyclic Loading, J Steel and Constr. Eng., 3(4), 120-138.