Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Evaluation of seismic resilience of high-rise structures by considering the life cycle

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
iman rafsanjaneasl 1
Abbas Ghasemi 2
Shaghayegh Nazari 1
1 MSc., Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor/ Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences/ Central Tehran Branch Islamic Azad University
10.22065/jsce.2024.468859.3470
Abstract
With the increase of population in the main cities in the country and the limited space of the cities, the need for high-rise safe structures is felt more and more. Also, most of these cities, like Tehran, are located in seismic zones with high risk, so as a result, seismic criteria must be satisfied in their design. This research, while evaluating the seismic performance of high-rise structures in the diagonal system under nonlinear time history analysis by drawing failure curves in terms of relative displacement in three levels, it is necessary to use this structural system due to the effect of reducing the relative displacement to about fifty percent. We are from damper. In order to achieve the appropriate geometry in the diagonal frame, additional load analysis was applied to the frames and the result shows the impact of the design's plasticity on the amount of deformation, which will not always have a direct relationship with the angle of the diagonal element and stiffness. At the same time, by considering two elements of stability in terms of base shear and agility in terms of days, it evaluates the resilience of this system for high-rise structures. While defining the functional limits, damage through the formation of plastic joints in the elements It is considered and the time and cost required to restore the system performance to the initial state through the replacement or repair of the member is estimated. All analyzes and designs have been done in finite element software for two cases of frames with viscous dampers and without these dampers for two height levels of 168 and 248 meters. Finally, a method for constructing artificial acceleration maps to consider the effect of aftershocks on damaged structures after the main earthquake is presented.
Keywords
Seismic resilience
high-rise diagrid structure
nonlinear time history analysis
pushover analysis
viscous damper
life cycle

Subjects

[1] FEMA p58. Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings., December 2018, washington, dc: Federal Emergency Management Agency
 [2]Quantification of Disaster Resilience Of Health Care Facilities, September 2009, Technical Report MCEER-09-0009
 [3]Montuori, G.M., Mele, E., Brandonisio, G. and De Luca,A. \Design criteria for diagrid tall buildings: Sti_ness
versus strength", Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23(17), pp. 1294-1314 (2013).
10.24200/j30.2020.56543.2839
 [4] M. Roshani, A. Meshkat Dini. (2022). Seismic Resilience Analysis of High-Rise Diagrid Structures with Various Skeletal Configurations Based on Robustness Criterion. Journal, Volume (Issue), Page(s).
 [5] Mohammadian, S., Mohammadi, M., and Jabri, A. (2023). "Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Steel Structures Considering Seismic Sequence: Application of FEMA P-58 Code." Journal of Civil Engineering and Steel Structures, Volume 10, Number 3, Pages 45-67
 [6] Sadeghi, S., & Rofooei, F. R. (2020). Improving the seismic performance of diagrid structures using buckling restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 166, 105905.
 [7] Zhang, Y., et al. (2020). "Evolutionary optimization of diagrid frame geometry for tall buildings to enhance seismic performance." Journal of Structural Engineering.
 [8] Lee, J., et al. (2019). "Parametric optimization of diagrid systems for enhanced seismic performance using intelligent algorithms." Computers and Structures.
 [9]Moradi, M., & Abdolmohammadi, M. (2020). Seismic fragility evaluation of a diagrid structure based on energy method. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 174, 106311.
 [10]Cimellaro, G.P., Fumo, C., Reinhorn, A.M., Bruneau, M. (2009). "Quantification of Disaster Resilience of Health Care Facilities." Technical Report MCEER-09-0009, University at Buffalo.
 [11] Eagan, S., et al. (2016). "Advanced methods for seismic evaluation and design of resilient structures considering life cycle." Journal of Structural Engineering.
 [12] Zandi, M., & Masoumi, A. (2018). "Probabilistic analysis of seismic resilience in high-rise buildings with viscous dampers." Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.
 [13]FEMA p58. Implementation Guide Second Edition, , December 2018, washington, dc: Federal Emergency Management Agency
 [14] Afzali Fard, Shakri, Kazem, & Jahangiri. (2023). Providing a method to calculate the seismic resilience and the cost-time curve of the expected reconstruction of buildings. Structural and construction engineering, 10(4), 107-132
 [15] Roshani, M. (2023, August). Performance assessment and calculation of robustness of high-rise diagrid tube structures with various configurations. In Structures (Vol. 54, pp. 898-917). Elsevier.
 [16] Molina Hutt, C., Almufti, I., Willford, M., & Deierlein, G. (2016). Seismic loss and downtime assessment of e×isting tall steel-framed buildings and strategies for increased resilience. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(8), C4015005.
 [17] Ayyub, B. M. (2015). Practical resilience metrics for planning, design, and decision making. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 1(3), 04015008.
 [18] Bharath, P. S., Bommisetty, J., Keertan, T. S., & Manoj, T. (2024, June). An assessment of seismic performance of high-rise diagrid structure with plan irregularity. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2779, No. 1, p. 012031). IOP Publishing.
 [19] Saadati, D., Javadi, P., Moghadam, A. S., & Hosseini, M. H. (2024). Evaluation of Steel Diagrid Structural System Under Near-Fault Earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 28(8), 2330-2360.
 [20] Heshmati, M., Khatami, A., & Shakib, H. (2020, June). Seismic performance assessment of tubular diagrid structures with varying angles in tall steel buildings. In Structures (Vol. 25, pp. 113-126). Elsevier.
 [21] Boake, T. M. (2014). Diagrid structures: systems, connections, details. Walter de Gruyter.
 [22]Zoccolini, L., Bruschi, E., Cattaneo, S., & Quaglini, V. (2023). Current trends in fluid viscous dampers with semi-active and adaptive behavior. Applied Sciences, 13(18), 10358.
 [23] ASCE/SEI 41-17. Seismic evaluation and retrot of e×isting Buildings., 2017, Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers
 [24] Kitayama, S. (2017). Development and evaluation of procedures for analysis and design of buildings with fluidic self-centering systems (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo).
 [25] Kitayama, S., & Constantinou, M. C. (2016). Probabilistic collapse resistance and residual drift assessment of buildings with fluidic self‐centering systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 45(12), 1935-1953.
 [26] FEMA-356.: Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings American Society of Civil Engin
 [27] Wen, R., Seker, O., Akbas, B., & Shen, J. (2016). Designs of special concentrically braced frame using AISC 341-05 and AISC 341-10. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 21(1), 04015011.
 [28] An, N. and He, Z. \A framework of seismic design based on structural resilience", In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering (ICCSTE-2016), Ottawa, Canada (2016)
 [29] Initiative, T. B. (2017). Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings. TBI: Berkeley, CA, USA.
 [30] Kircher, C., Deierlein, G., Hooper, J., Krawinkler, H., Mahin, S., Shing, B., & Wallace, J. (2010). Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors.
 [31] Özuygur, A. R. (2016, February). Performance-based Seismic Design of an Irregular Tall Building—A Case Study. In Structures (Vol. 5, pp. 112-122). Elsevier.
 [32] FEMA p695. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors., June 2009, washington, dc: Federal Emergency Management Agency
 [33] ATC Hazard by location, (Year published). Page title. [online] Available at: https://hazards.atcouncil.org/.
 [34] Application of Endurance Time method in linear seismic analysis H.E. Estekanchi_, V. Valamanesh, A. Vafai
Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Iran Received 15 June 2006; received in revised form 28 December 2006; accepted 6 January 2007 Available online 20 February 2007.
 [35] Romano, E., Cascini, L., D'Aniello, M., Portioli, F., & Landolfo, R. (2020, October). A simplified multi-performance approach to life-cycle assessment of steel structures. In Structures (Vol. 27, pp. 371-382). Elsevier.
 [36] Hamidia, & Dalili Yazdi. (2022). Quantitative investigation of seismic resilience in steel bending frames equipped with nonlinear viscous dampers under secondary earthquake. Civil Engineering, 38(1.2), 51-65
 [37] Mohammadian Asl, Soheil. (winter 2019). Life cycle cost analysis of steel structures considering the sequence tremors. Master. Sahand University of Technology, Civil engineering,.

  • Receive Date 07 August 2024
  • Revise Date 21 October 2024
  • Accept Date 07 November 2024