Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

An optimization approach for wharf location by Genetic algorithm, event tree and neural network; Case study: mechanized railway terminal for transportation of mineral bulk materials in Shahid Rajaei port

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master of science student, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
5 Master of science, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In this research, by using the genetic algorithm, which is a type of meta heuristic algorithms, the optimal number of wharfs is calculated based on the number of existing ships, the profit from the export and import of iron ore, and the waiting time. The best chromosome of each generation is classified according to the maximum amount of profit obtained during the operation period of the project. In addition to identifying the best number of ships and waiting time, it also identifies the best possible capacity for the project by using the event tree and taking into account the possibilities of tides, market supply and demand, and the impact of the sanction, so that the project can reach to the maximum profit at the time of operation with the least risk. Then, by using the neural network and taking into account the costs of dredging, dike and conveyor belt, the exact location of the dike is determined, so that the cost of construction is reduced to the minimum possible amount.

This research has been carried out as a case study on the construction of a mechanized rail terminal for mineral bulk materials in Shahid Rajaei port and it helps the experts in this field for feasibility and basic studies to identify the most optimal mode as soon as possible in order to Avoid wasting time and resources. In this research, the use of 2 wharfs with a capacity of 16 million tons per year has been identified as the best plan. Also; The best place to build a wharf has been identified at a distance of 350 meters from the end of the land.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Robenek, T., Umang, N., Bierlaire, M., & Ropke, S. (2014). A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(2),399-411.
[2] Notteboom, T. (2011). An application of multi-criteria analysis to the location of a container hub port in South Africa. Maritime policy & management, 38(1),51-79.
[3] Buhrkal, K., Zuglian, S., Ropke, S., Larsen, J., & Lusby, R. (2011). Models for the discrete berth allocation problem: A computational comparison. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(4),461-473.
[4] Umang, N., Bierlaire, M., & Vacca, I. (2013). Exact and heuristic methods to solve the berth allocation problem in bulk ports. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 54,14-31.
[5] Imai, A., Nagaiwa, K. I., & Tat, C. W. (1997). Efficient planning of berth allocation for container terminals in Asia. Journal of Advanced transportation, 31(1), 75-94.
[6] Imai, A., Nishimura, E., & Papadimitriou, S. (2001). The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 35(4),401-417.
[7] Monaco, M. F., & Sammarra, M. (2007). The berth allocation problem: a strong formulation solved by a Lagrangean approach. Transportation Science, 41(2), 265-280.
[8] Buhrkal, K., Zuglian, S., Ropke, S., Larsen, J., & Lusby, R. (2011). Models for the discrete berth allocation problem: A computational comparison. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(4),461-473.
[9] Nishimura, E., Imai, A., & Papadimitriou, S. (2001). Berth allocation planning in the public berth system by genetic algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(2), 282-292.
[10] Tsai, A. H., Lee, C. N., Wu, J. S., & Chang, F. S. (2015). A novel berth-based genetic algorithm for berth allocation planning. In Proceedings of the ASE BigData & SocialInformatics 2015 (pp  1-9).
[11] Seyedalizadeh Ganji, S. R., Babazadeh, A., & Arabshahi, N. (2010). Analysis of the continuous berth allocation problem in container ports using a genetic algorithm. Journal of marine science and technology, 15,408-416.
[12] Yan, S., Lu, C. C., Hsieh, J. H., & Lin, H. C. (2015). A network flow model for the dynamic and flexible berth allocation problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 81,65-77.
[13] Imai, A., Chen, H. C., Nishimura, E., & Papadimitriou, S. (2008). The simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(5),900-920.
[14] Lalla-Ruiz, E., González-Velarde, J. L., Melián-Batista, B., & Moreno-Vega, J. M. (2014). Biased random key genetic algorithm for the tactical berth allocation problem. Applied Soft Computing, 22,60-76.
[15] Giallombardo, G., Moccia, L., Salani, M., & Vacca, I. (2010). Modeling and solving the tactical berth allocation problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(2),232-245.

  • Receive Date 15 June 2024
  • Revise Date 22 August 2024
  • Accept Date 14 September 2024