Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Assessing the performance of a high rise building equipped with general type 2 fuzzy controller under seismic excitation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD graduate ,Engineering faculty ,Ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Mashhad,Iran
2 Associated professor, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
So far no reports have been presented for the use of general type 2 fuzzy systems to control civil engineering structures. Considering the increasing success of this algorithm in other fields the importance of addressing general type 2 fuzzy systems becomes evident. Control systems always deal with Uncertainty; therefore, studying innovative algorithms that can effectively manage uncertainty seems necessary. The fuzzy membership functions in general type 2 systems provides additional degrees of freedom for design, giving these systems a higher potential for considering uncertainties. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed general type 2 fuzzy control system, type 1 and interval type 2 fuzzy systems and a linear quadratic Gaussian controller (LQG) as a classic control method have been designed.. The performance of the controllers on a 20-story nonlinear benchmark structure has been evaluated through computer simulation in MATLAB. By comparing the responses of the structure equipped with these four proposed controllers, it can be concluded that general type 2 fuzzy controller performs better in reducing structural responses and preventing damage to structural members. It is hoped that this research can serve as a starting and encouraging point for the application of powerful general Type 2 fuzzy tool in civil engineering purposes, especially in structural vibration control.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Wani, Z. R., Tantray, M., Farsangi, E. N., Nikitas, N., Noori, M., Samali, B., & Yang, T. Y. (2022). A critical review on control strategies for structural vibration control. Annual Reviews in Control54, 103-124.
[2] Ikeda, Y. (2004). Active and semi-active control of buildings in Japan. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering4(3), 278-282.
[3] Jalaeefar, A., & Kiani, M. (2021). Assessing the Efficiency of an Active Viscous Damper in Near-Field and Far-Field Earthquakes. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering8(6), 280-300.
[4] Fazaeli Hosseini Nejad, H. and Karamodin, A. (2022). Semi-active control of three-story benchmark structure using LQG algorithm with a fuzzy-genetic system. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering9(5), pp.107-123.
[5] Bahrami Rad, A., Nouri, M., Katebi, J. and Mousavi Ghasemi, S.A. (2021). A Kalman Filter-based model predictive control scheme with actuator saturation consideration for active control of a nine-story benchmark SAC building. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering8(8), pp.155-173.
[6] Soong, T.T. (1988). State-of-the-art review: active structural control in civil engineering. Engineering Structures10(2), pp.74-84.
[7] Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control8(3), pp.338-353.
[8] Mamdani, E. H. (1974, December). Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. In Proceedings of the institution of electrical engineers (Vol. 121, No. 12, pp. 1585-1588). IET Digital Library.
[9] Zadeh, L.A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information sciences8(3), pp.199-249.
[10] Carvajal, O., Melin, P., Miramontes, I., & Prado-Arechiga, G. (2021). Optimal design of a general type-2 fuzzy classifier for the pulse level and its hardware implementation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence97, 104069.
[11] Ontiveros-Robles, E., Melin, P. and Castillo, O. (2018), Comparative analysis of noise robustness of type 2 fuzzy logic controllers, Kybernetika, 54(1), 175-201.
[12] Mittal, K., Jain, A., Vaisla, K.S., Castillo, O. and Kacprzyk, J. (2020), A comprehensive review on type 2 fuzzy logic applications: Past, present and future, Eng. Applicat. Artif. Intell. 95, 103916.
[13] Bahmaei, M. and Zahrai, S.M. (2022). Semi-active control of adjacent 3-and 9-story structures using type-1 and type-2 fuzzy algorithms. Journal of Vibration and Sound11(21), pp.30-45.
[14] Azadvar, M., Hajkazemi, H., & Karamoddin, A. (2018). structural damage control with interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller. AUT Journal of Civil Engineering2(2), 125-134.
[15] Ramezani1a, M., Bathaei, A., & Zahrai, S. M. (2019). Comparing fuzzy type-1 and-2 in semi-active control with TMD considering uncertainties. Smart Struct Systems23(2), 155-171.
[16] Al-Ghazali, A. S., & Shariatmadar, H. (2021, October). Hybrid active control of adjacent buildings interconnected by viscous dampers utilizing type-2 fuzzy controller considering soil-structure interaction. In Structures (Vol. 33, pp. 292-306). Elsevier.
[17] Hosseini Lavassani, S. H., & Shangapour, S. (2022). Interval type-2 fuzzy hybrid control of a high-rise building including soil–structure interaction under near-field and far-field ground motions. Structural Engineering International32(3), 316-327.
[18] Mendel, J. M. (2007). Advances in type-2 fuzzy sets and systems. Information sciences177(1), 84-110.
[19] Karnik, N. N., & Mendel, J. M. (1998, May). Introduction to type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In 1998 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems proceedings. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (Cat. No. 98CH36228) (Vol. 2, pp. 915-920). IEEE.
[20]Hagras, H. (2007). Type-2 FLCs: A new generation of fuzzy controllers. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine2(1), 30-43.
[21] John, R., & Coupland, S. (2007). Type-2 fuzzy logic: A historical view. IEEE computational intelligence magazine2(1), 57-62.
[22] Mendel, J., Hagras, H., Tan, W. W., Melek, W. W., & Ying, H. (2014). Introduction to type-2 fuzzy logic control: theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
[23] Wu, H., & Mendel, J. M. (2002). Uncertainty bounds and their use in the design of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems10(5), 622-639.
[24] Wu, D., & Mendel, J. M. (2010). On the continuity of type-1 and interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems19(1), 179-192.
[25] Mendel, J. M., John, R. I., & Liu, F. (2006). Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems14(6), 808-821.
[26] Liang, Q., & Mendel, J. M. (2000). Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy systems8(5), 535-550.
[27] Mendel, J. M., & Liu, F. (2008, June). On new quasi-type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence) (pp. 354-360). IEEE.
[28] Mendel, J. M., Liu, F., & Zhai, D. (2009). $\alpha $-plane representation for type-2 fuzzy sets: Theory and applications. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems17(5), 1189-1207.
[29] Liu, F. (2008). An efficient centroid type-reduction strategy for general type-2 fuzzy logic system. Information Sciences178(9), 2224-2236.
[30] Karnik, N. N., & Mendel, J. M. (2001). Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set. Information SCiences132(1-4), 195-220.
[31] Ohtori, Y., Christenson, R. E., Spencer Jr, B. F., & Dyke, S. J. (2004). Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. Journal of engineering mechanics130(4), 366-385.
[32] Cuevas, F., Castillo, O., & Cortes, P. (2022). Optimal setting of membership functions for interval type-2 fuzzy tracking controllers using a shark smell metaheuristic algorithm. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems24(2), 799-822.
[33] Shahabian Moghaddam, F., Shariatmadar, H. and Golnargesi, S. (2023). Tuning the Type-2 Fuzzy Controller for Active Control of Buildings under Seismic Vibrations. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 47(3), pp.1643-1656.

  • Receive Date 14 May 2024
  • Revise Date 05 August 2024
  • Accept Date 12 September 2024