A numerical study on the cyclic behavior of special truss moment frames with X-shaped pipe damper

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 M.Sc. Graduate, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Special Truss Moment Frame (STMF) is a type of steel moment frames that has high lateral stiffness due to deep girders and can be used over long spans. For an STMF subjected to cyclic loading, energy dissipation is provided through the yielding of the special part located in the mid-span. This paper presents a numerical study on the cyclic behavior of STMFs in which the special part is equipped with yielding damper as a means of energy dissipative device. For this purpose, it is aimed to investigate the effect of the parameters of X-shaped pipe damper (XPD) on the cyclic behavior of STMFs. The application of these dampers has been investigated in two configurations; once with clamped and again with pin-ended beams at the special part. The results of finite element analysis are compared based on the parameters of cyclic behavior (stiffness and strength), the amount of maximum cumulative plastic strain and the energy dissipation capacity of the specimens. Based on the results obtained from the analysis of the STMF with pin-ended beams at the special part, the use of proposed X-shaped damper increases the energy dissipation capacity of the frame by 70%. Increasing the thickness of the X-shaped pipe damper increases the yield and ultimate load bearing capacity of the frame. In addition, the stress and strain concentration in the frame members is reduced which in turn prevents the damage evolution in these members.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] AISC 341 (2016). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
[2] Itani, A. and Goel, S.C. (1991). Earthquake resistant design of open web framing systems. Research Report No. UMCE 91-21, University of Michigan, Dept. Civil and Environmental Eng., Ann Arbor, MI.
[3] Goel, S.C., and Itani, A.M. (1994). Seismic behavior of open-web truss-moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 120(6), 1763-1780.
[4] Basha, H.S. and Goel, S.C. (1994). Seismic Resistant Truss Moment Frames with Ductile Vierendeel Segment. Research Report No. UMCEE 94-29, University of Michigan, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI.
[5] AISC 341 (1997). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
[6] Soong, T.T., Dargush, G.F. (1997). Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering. John Wiley & Sons, UK.
[7] Soong, T.T., Spencer, BF. (2002). Supplemental energy dissipation: State-of-the-art and State-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures, 24(3):243-59.
[8] FEMA 450 (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures with accompanying commentary. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
[9] Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2012). Failure mode control and seismic response of dissipative truss moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(11):1388–97.
[10] Fathizadeh, S.F., Dehghani, S., Yang, T.Y., Vosoughi, A.R., Farsangi, E.N. and Hajirasouliha, I. (2021). Seismic performance assessment of multi-story steel frames with curved dampers and semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 182, 106666.
[11] Pekcan, G., Linke, C. and Itani, A. (2009). Damage avoidance design of special truss moment frames with energy dissipating devices. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(6):1374-1384.
[12] Jiansinlapadamrong, C., Simasathien, S., Okazaki, T. and Chao, S.H. (2017). Cyclic loading performance of full-scale special truss moment frame with innovative details for high seismic activity. In: 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), Santiago, Chile.
[13] Sachan, A. and Rai, D.C. (2012). Aluminum Shear Yielding Damper (Al-SYD) as an Energy Dissipation Device in Truss Moment Frames (TMFs). In: 15th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering (WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal.
[14] Askariani, S. S., Garivani, S., Hasani, M., & Hajirasouliha, I. (2021). Special truss moment frames equipped with steel slit dampers. International Journal of Steel Structures, 1-19.
[15] Guo, W., Wang, X., Yu, Y., Chen, X., Li, S., Fang, W., Zeng, C., Wang, Y. and Bu, D. (2020). Experimental study of a steel damper with X-shaped welded pipe halves. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 170, 106087.
[16] Simasathien, S., Jiansinlapadamrong, C. and Chao, S.H. (2017). Seismic behavior of special truss moment frame with double hollow structural sections as chord members. Engineering Structures, 131, 14-27.
[17] Zabihi Samani, M., Abed Ebrahimi, M. H., & tarighi, P. (2019). Evaluation of Slit Steel Damper & Reduced Beam Section Connections under Cyclic Loading. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 6(Issue 2), 209-222. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2017.98867.1329.
[18] Kohnehpooshi, O., & Salem, A. (2020). Structural behavior of steel slit damper in steel beam to column connection. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 7(1), 26-40. doi: 10.22065/jsce.2018.112329.1416.
[19] Sahoo, D. R., Singhal, T., Taraithia, S. S., & Saini, A. (2015). Cyclic behavior of shear-and-flexural yielding metallic dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 114, 247-257.
[20] Chopra, A.K. (1995). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, U.S.A.
[21] Araei, A.A. and Ghodrati, A. (2017). Predictive models for normalized shear modulus and damping ratio of modeled rockfill materials. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 14(1), 27-40.