Evaluation of Structural Damages Reduction of Midrise Steel Moment Frame adding Cross-Laminated Timber Infill Wall by Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of Civil Engineering Department, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Candidate in Civil Engineering Department, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Considering that in recent decades, the discussion of earthquake engineering for better understanding of earthquakes and their destructive effects on structures built in seismic areas has made significant progress, which has led to changes in building design regulations against earthquakes. In some cases, structures designed based on initial revisions of seismic codes and standards have lower seismic resistance than structures designed with newer revisions. As a result, constructed structures need to be retrofitted. In this paper, the reduction of seismic damage of six-stories steel moment frames having CLT infill walls has been investigated. The system is modeled with ABAQUS software. The S4R element has been used to model steel beams and columns with a yield strength of 350 MPa. Cross-sectional vertical panels with C3D8 R element according to NDS 2018 are modeled elastically in the software. Contact modeling was performed between the vertical panel with the steel frame by assigning the behavior of the Hard Contact type in the direction perpendicular to the plates in contact with each other and the Tangential type in the direction of the tangent of the two plates with friction coefficient. Also, the gap between the steel frame and the CLT is crossed to deform the brackets during an earthquake to dissipate the earthquake energy during the vibration. Frame behavior has been investigated using incremental dynamic analysis. The results showed that CLT infill walls play a major role in reducing maximum inter-story drift and various structural damages. The results also showed that the addition of CLT infill walls reduces the possibility of the collapse of the structure at various damages.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 [1] Xu L, Martínez J.2006. Strength and stiffness determination of shear wall panels in cold-formed steel framing. Journal of structure Engineering; 44(10):1084-1095.
[2] Gad EF, Duffield CF, Hutchinson GL, Mansell DS, Stark G.1999. Lateral performance of cold formed steel-framed domestic structures. Journal of engineering structures; 21 (1): 83-95.
[3] Rinaldin G, Amadio C.2013.  A component approach for the hysteretic behaviour of connections in cross-laminated wooden structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics; 42: 2023-2042.
[4] Ceccotti A, Sandhaas C, Okabe M, Yasumura M, Minowa C, Kawai N. 2013. SOFIE project–3D shaking table test on a seven‐storey full‐scale cross‐laminated timber building. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics; 42(13): 2003-2021.
[5] Popovski M, Karacabeyli E.2012. Seismic behaviour of cross-laminated timber structures. Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, WCEE:1-12.
[6] Krawinkler H, Parisi F, Ibarra L, Ayoub  A, Medina R.2001.  Development of a testing protocol for woodframe structures. Richmond, CA: CUREE.
[7] Schneider J, Karacabeyli E, Popovski M., Stiemer SF, Tesfamariam S. 2013. Damage assessment of connections used in cross-laminated timber subject to cyclic loads. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities;  28(6): A4014008-1- A4014008-14
[8] Shen YL, Schneider J, Tesfamariam S, Stiemer SF, Mu Z G.2013.  Hysteresis behavior of bracket connection in cross-laminated-timber shear walls. Construction and Building Materials; 48(41): 980-991.
[9] Hassanieh A, Valipour HR, Bradford MA.2016. Load-slip behaviour of steel-cross laminated timber (CLT) composite connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research; 122:110-121.
[10] “APA-the engineered wood products. 2016. www-apawood.org.
[11] Bezabeh MA, Tesfamariam S, Stiemern SF, Popovski M, Erol K.2019. Displacement-based seismic design of structures.  Earthquake Spectra; 32(3): 1565-1585.
[12] Priestley M, Calvi G, & Kowalsky M. 2007. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
[13] Sullivan T, Priestley M, & Calvi G. 2006. Direct displacement-based design of frame-wall structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering; 10(1): 91–124.
[14] Sullivan T, Priestley M, & Calvi, G. 2010. Introduction to a model code for displacement-based seismic design.
Advances in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering : 137–148.
[15] Sullivan T J, Lago A. 2012. Towards a simplified direct DBD procedure for the seismic design of moment resisting frames with viscous dampers. Engineering Structures; 35: 140-148.
[16] Garcia R, Sullivan T, & Corte G. 2010. Development of a displacement-based design method for steel frame-RC wall  buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering; 14 (2): 252–277.
[17] Gagnon S, Pirvu C.2011. CLT Handbook-Canadian Edition. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication, Quebec Canada, 1-70.
[18] American national standards institute and American forest & paper association. national design specification for wood construction(NDS): 2018. American forest & paper association.
[19] CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2014. Design of steel structures. CSA S16-14. Ottawa: CSA.
[20] Luco N, Cornell CA.2007. Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions. Earthquake Spectra; 23(2):357-392.
[21] Dickof  C. 2007. CLT Infill Panels in Steel Moment Resisting Frames as a Hybrid Seismic Force resisting System. Thesis for the Degree of Master. University of British Columbia. Vancouver: Canada. 
[22] Ang AHS, Deleon D.1997. Determination of optimal target reliabilities for design and upgrading of structures. Structural Safety; 19(1): 91–103 .
[23] Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA.2002. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; 31(3): 491-514.
[24] Jalayer F, Cornell CA.2000.  A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor (DCFD) seismic formats. Report No. RMS-43, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford.
[25] Cornell C.A, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA.2002.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering; 128(4): 526-533.
[26] Federal Emergency Management Agency.2003. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake
model. HAZUS-MH MR4 technical manual.
[27] ABAQUS Version 6.14.  Analysis User’s Manual,­ Dassault Systemes; SIMULIA, 2014.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 06 September 2022
  • Accept Date: 09 October 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics