Investigating the effect of rigidity of the diaphragm and connections constraints on the overall behavior of steel braced frames under fire load

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of civil engineering, Faculty of engineering, Ferdowsi university of masshad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The resistance of steel structures under accidental loading conditions such as fire is affected by the inherent characteristics of the structure such as redundancy, ductility and joint constraints. On the other hand, due to the action of the structural components exposed to fire, the rigidity of the diaphragm and the performance of the connections are subjected to damage. This paper examines effects of the rigidity of the diaphragm and the shear connections constraints as part of the fire-resistant properties of steel braced frames. Two modes of operation of the floors in the form of rigid diaphragm and soft diaphragm, as well as two modes of operation of shear connections in the form of hinged and rolled joints, have been evaluated under a fire scenario. The effect of gravity and fire loads on a 10-story steel braced frame is simulated in these cases using numerical analysis techniques using finite element method. Analysis show that fire resistance time of braced frames and structural collapse mechanisms are severely affected by the presence or absence of diaphragms as well as tensile constraints on shear joints. As in the case of the existence rigid diaphragm of the structure, it undergoes a total collapse in a short time, and also in the absence of tensile constraints of the joints, the collapse mechanism locally changes position. Analysis results can also help engineers understand local and general responses to steel braced frames under fire loading.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] O'Connor MA, Martin DM, Behaviour of a Multi-storey Steel Framed Building Subjected to Fire Attack, (1998).
[2] Gu L, Kodur V, Role of Insulation Effectiveness on Fire Resistance of Steel Structures under Extreme Loading Events, (2011);25: 277-86.
[3] Huang Z, Burgess IW, Plank RJ, Three-Dimensional Analysis of Composite Steel-Framed Buildings in Fire, (2000);126: 389-97.
[4] Liew JYR, Ma KY, Advanced analysis of 3D steel framework exposed to compartment fire, (2004);28: 253-67.
[5] Saab HA, Nethercot DA, Modelling steel frame behaviour under fire conditions, Engineering Structures, (1991);13: 371-82.
[6] Wang YC, Moore DB, Steel frames in fire: analysis, Engineering Structures, (1995);17: 462-72.
[7] Jiang J, Usmani A, Bisby L. Nonlinear thermo mechanical analysis of structures using OpenSees. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, (2012).
[8] Alderighi E, Salvatore W, Structural fire performance of earthquake-resistant composite steel–concrete frames, Engineering Structures, (2009);31: 894-909.
[9] Röben C, Gillie M, Torero J, Structural behaviour during a vertically travelling fire, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2010);66: 191-97.
[10] Hong S, Varma A, Agarwal A, Prasad K. Behavior of steel building structures under realistic fire loading. Conference Ttile, (2008).
[11] Sun R, Huang Z, Burgess IW, Progressive collapse analysis of steel structures under fire conditions, Engineering Structures, (2012);34: 400-13.
[12] Wong MB, Plastic Frame Analysis under Fire Conditions, ASCE’s Journal of Structural engineering, (2001);127: 290-95.
[13] Wong MB, Elastic and plastic methods for numerical modelling of steel structures subject to fire, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2001);57: 1-14.
[14] Garlock ME, Selamet S, Modeling and Behavior of Steel Plate Connections Subject to Various Fire Scenarios, (2010);136: 897-906.
[15] Huang S-S, Davison B, Burgess IW, High-temperature tests on joints to steel and partially-encased H-section columns, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2013);80: 243-51.
[16] Lee C-H, Chiou Y-J, Chung H-Y, Chen C-J, Numerical modeling of the fire–structure behavior of steel beam-to-column connections, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2011);67: 1386-400.
[17] Spyrou S, Davison JB, Burgess IW, Plank RJ, Experimental and analytical investigation of the ‘tension zone’ components within a steel joint at elevated temperatures, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2004);60: 867-96.
[18] Wang M, Wang P, Strategies to increase the robustness of endplate beam–column connections in fire, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2013);80: 109-20.
[19] Yu H, Burgess IW, Davison JB, Plank RJ, Numerical simulation of bolted steel connections in fire using explicit dynamic analysis, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2008);64: 515-25.
[20] Kodur VKR, Naser M, Pakala P, Varma A, Modeling the response of composite beam–slab assemblies exposed to fire, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2013);80: 163-73.
[21] Usmani AS, Rotter JM, Lamont S, Sanad AM, Gillie M, Fundamental principles of structural behaviour under thermal effects, Fire Safety Journal, (2001);36: 721-44.
[22] Wellman EI, Varma AH, Fike R, Kodur V, Experimental Evaluation of Thin Composite Floor Assemblies under Fire Loading, (2011);137: 1002-16.
[23] Ghosh SK. Assessing ability of seismic structural systems to withstand progressive collapse: design of steel braced frame buildings. In. Assessing ability of seismic structural systems to withstand progressive collapse: design of steel braced frame buildings. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, (2006).
[24] ASCE 7-05: Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. In. ASCE 7-05: Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Virginia, US, American Society of Civil Engineers, (2005).
[25] ANSI/AISC 341-05: Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. In. ANSI/AISC 341-05: Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, US, American Institute of Steel Construction, (2005).
[26] ANSI/AISC 360-05: Specifications for structural steel buildings. In. ANSI/AISC 360-05: Specifications for structural steel buildings. Chicago, US, American Institute of Steel Construction, (2005).
[27] AISC Steel construction manual. In. AISC Steel construction manual. Chicago, US, American Institute of Steel Construction, (2006).
[28] International Building Code (IBC). In. International Building Code (IBC). International Code Council, (2006).
[29] Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. ABAQUS 6.14 Documentation. In. ABAQUS 6.14 Documentation. RI, USA, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, (2014).
[30] Behnam B, Ronagh HR, Post-Earthquake Fire performance-based behavior of unprotected moment resisting 2D steel frames, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, (2014);19: 274-84.
[31] ASCE 7-10: Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. In. ASCE 7-10: Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Virginia, US, American Society of Civil Engineers, (2010).
[32] EN 1993-1-2, Eurocode3: Design of Steel Structures, Part1–2: GeneralRules- Structural Fire Design. In. EN 1993-1-2, Eurocode3: Design of Steel Structures, Part1–2: GeneralRules- Structural Fire Design. Brussels, Belgium, European Committee for Normalization, (2005).
[33] Quiel Spencer E, Garlock Maria EM. Modeling High-Rise Steel Framed Buildings under Fire. Conference Ttile, (2008).
[34] Kaffash R, Karamodin A, Investigating the behavior Of Special Steel Concentrically Braced Frames exposed to fire, Journal of structural and Construction Engineering, (2019).
[35] Al-Jabri KS, Davison JB, Burgess IW, Performance of beam-to-column joints in fire—A review, Fire Safety Journal, (2008);43: 50-62.
[36] Rubert A, Schaumann P, Tragverhalten stählerner Rahmensysteme bei Brandbeanspruchung Stahlbau, ( September 1985);54: 280-87
[37] Almand K, Phan L, McAllister T, Starnes M, Gross J. NET-SFPE Workshop for Development of a National R&D Roadmap for Structural Fire Safety Design and Retrofit of Structures. In. NET-SFPE Workshop for Development of a National R&D Roadmap for Structural Fire Safety Design and Retrofit of Structures. National Institute of Standards and Technology, (2004).