Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering

Influence of Stiffeners and their arrangement on frequency and seismic response of intake tower during construction

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Ehsan Teymoori 1
saeed abbasi 2
Amir Javad moradloo 3
1 Department of Civil engineering, University of Zanajn
2 Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
3 Department of Civil engineering, University of zanjan
10.22065/jsce.2020.208652.2004
Abstract
In this study, the effects of added stiffeners on the frequency and seismic response of an intake tower during construction period are investigated. For this purpose and in order to better investigate the effects of stiffeners, two types of circular and vertical stiffeners have been used in different numbers and height levels. It is also examined for situations where the weight of the structure is reduced in the amount of the added stiffeners' weight.In this study, the frequency responseof these models after adding the stiffeners was compared with the original model. The results show that the initial frequency of the structures is reduced and increased by the use of circular and vertical stiffeners, respectively. This indicates the effects of type and number of stiffeners on the frequency response of the structure. In order to better investigate the effects of these types of stiffeners, examined intake towers have been subjected to seismic excitation. The results show that the displacements and stresses are increased for the states in which circular stiffeners are considered. Also, for the intake towers with the vertical stiffeners, the values of displacements are decreased and the stress values are adjusted depending on the level of stiffeners. The results indicate the importance of the effects of stiffeners on the frequency response and seismic response of the intake tower and indicate the necessity of investigating these states.
Keywords
Intake Tower
Circular Stiffener
Vertical Stiffener
Frequency Analysis
Seismic Analysis
Finite Element Method

Subjects

  1. Daniell, W. E. and Taylor, C. A. (2003). “Developing a numerical model for a UK intake tower seismic assessment”. P. I. Civil Eng-water, 56(01), 63-72.
  2. Goyal, A. and Chopra, A. K. (1989). “Simplified evaluation of added hydrodynamic mass for intake towers”. Proceedings of ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 115(7), 1393-1412.
  3. Xaoxi, Zh. and Zongmin. W. (2005). “The application of ANSYS software to the static and dynamic stress analysis of high intake tower”. Water power, 31(3), 72-73
  4. Wei, P. and Shuli, F. (2010). “The static and dynamic analysis of Guandi station intake tower structure”. Design of Hydroelectric Power Station, 26(3), 25-27.
  5. Lopez, F. J. and Chopra, A. K. (2012). “Response - History Analysis of the Moondarra Intake Tower: A Novel Approach Based on New Methodologies and Performance Requirements”. In: of the International Symposium on Dams for a Changing World, Kyoto.
  6. Gong Chenglin1, A. Liu Huaw, B. and Zhang Jian. (2014). “Study on Dynamic Properties of the Intake Tower with Finite Element Method”. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 501, 1888-1891.
  7. Goyal, A. and Chopra, A.K. (1989).” Hydrodynamic and foundation interaction effects in dynamics of intake towers: frequency response functions”. J Struct Eng,115(6),1371–1385.
  8. Goyal, A. and Chopra, A.K. (1989b). “Hydrodynamic and foundation interaction effects in dynamic of intake towers: earthquake responses”. J. Struct. Eng, 115(6), 1386-1395.
  9. Goyal, A. and Chopra, A.K. (1989c). “Simplified evaluation of added hydrodynamic mass for intake towers”. Eng. Mech, 115(7), 1393-1412.
  10. Goyal, A. and Chopra, A.K. (1989).” Earthquake response spectrum analysis of intake–outlet towers”. J Eng Mech, 115(7), 1413–1433.
  11. Goyal, A. and Chopra, A.K. (1989d). “Simplified evaluation of added hydrodynamic mass for intake towers”. Eng. Mech, 115(7), 1413-1433.
  12. and Richard, C. (1996). “Structural ParameterAnalysis of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Existing Intake Tower Inventory”. Vicksburg,: Technical Report SL-96-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, MS.
  13. and Richard, C. (1998). “Performance of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Intake Towers under Selected Loadings”. Vicksburg: Technical Report SL-98-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, MS.
  14. and Richard, C. (2000). “Performance of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Intake Towers under Selected Loadings”. Vicksburg : Technical Report ERDC/SL TR-00-6, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, MS.
  15. Millan, M.A., Young. Y.L. and Prevost, J.H. (2009). “Seismic response of intake towers including dam-tower interaction”. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 38(3), 307–329.
  16. Jiang, Y.X., Yue, J.C. and Ye, L.M. (2014).“Static and dynamic analysis of intake tower structure”. Appl Mech Mater, 444 – 445,912–915.
  17. Goyal, A. and Chopra, A.K. (1989). “Earthquake analysis of intake–outlet towers including tower–water–foundation–soil interaction”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 18(3), 325–34.
  18. Daniell, W.E. and Taylor, C.A. (1994). “Full-scale dynamic testing and analysis of a reservoir intake tower”. Eng. Struct. Dyn, 23(11), 1219-1237.
  19. Vidot, A.L., Suárez, L.E., Matheu, E.E. and Sharp, M.K. (2004). “Seismic analysis of intake towers considering multiple-support excitation and soil-structure interaction effects”. Vicksburg: US Army Corps of Engineers. ERDC/GSL TR-04-16.
  20. Millán, M. A., Young, Y. L. and Prévost. J. H. (2009). “Seismic Response of Intake Towers Including Dam – Tower Interaction”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38(3),307-329.
  21. Wang, H. B., Li, D. Y. and Tang, B. H. (2014). “Experimental study of dynamic interaction between group of intake tower and water”. Earthq. Struct, 6(02), 163-179.
  22. Alembagheri,M. (2016).” Dynamics of submerged intake towers including interaction with dam and foundation”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 84, 108–119.
  23. Wang, H., Li, D and Tang, B. (2014). “Experimental study of dynamic interaction between group of intake towers and water”. Earthquakes and Structures, 6(2), 163-179.
  24. Alembagheri, M. (2017).” Frequency domain analysis of submerged tower-dam dynamic interacton”. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 54(4), 264-275.
  25. Boseman, P. B. (1998). “Strengtheningof Natural Draught Cooling Tower Shells with Stiffening Rings”. Engineering Structures, 20(10), 909-914.
  26. Form, J. (1986). “The Ring-Stiffened Shell of the ISAR II Nuclear Power Plant Natural – Draught Cooling Tower”. Engineering Structures, 8(3), 99-207.
  27. Sabouri-Ghomi, S., Kharrazi, M. H. K., Asghari, A. and Javidan, P. (2005). “Effect of stiffening rings on buckling stability of RC hyperbolic cooling towers”. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 3(1).20-30.
  28. Wolf, J. P. (1986). “Seismic analysis of cooling towers”. Engineering Structures, 8(3),191-198.
  29. Bathe, K. J.(2007). “Finite element procedures”, In Engineering Analysis. Prentice Hall. University of Michigan. 2th Edn, 768-769.

  • Receive Date 26 November 2019
  • Revise Date 08 May 2020
  • Accept Date 11 June 2020