Uncertainty Quantification in Modeling of Steel Structures using Timoshenko Beam

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology

Abstract

This paper quantifies the uncertainty emanated from modeling steel structures using a Timoshenko beam. Using continuous beams to model building structures is a conventional approach in structural dynamic analyses. The use of Timoshenko beams, as a class of continuous beam models, in lieu of finite element models significantly expedites the computations. In turn, the reduction in the computational cost facilitates probabilistic, online identification and rapid damage detection of building structures in the aftermath of a seismic event. The prerequisite for structural identification using this method is the quantification of uncertainties that arise as a result of approximating the structure with a continuous beam, which is the primary objective of this research. To this end, an automated system is developed and subsequently employed to design 1000 finite element models of building structures followed by eigen-analyses to determine their natural frequencies and mode shapes. Thereafter, the residual of the eigen-equation of the Timoshenko beam given the frequency and mode shape from the exact finite element model is computed for each structure. Statistical analysis of these residuals for various structures leads to the distribution type, mean, and standard deviation for the probability distribution of the model error. The results show that the error is nearly insensitive to the height and dimensions of the plan, but is heavily dependent on the structural system. The results also show that the error standard deviation for steel moment-resisting frame systems is 3.5 times smaller than that of the steel concentrically-braced systems. This indicates that the Timoshenko beam model class provides a better estimation of steel moment-resisting frame systems.

Keywords


[1] Iwan, W. D. (1997). Drift spectrum: measure of demand for earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(4), 397–404.
[2] Foutch, D. A., & Jennings, P. C. (1978). A study of the apparent change in the foundation response of a nine-story reinforced concrete building. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68(1), 219–229.
[3] Dym, C. L., & Williams, H. E. (2007). Estimating fundamental frequencies of tall buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(10), 1479–1483.
[4] Miranda, E., & Taghavi, S. (2005). Approximate floor acceleration demands in multi-story buildings. I: Formulation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(2), 203–211.
[5] Taghavi, S., & Miranda, E. (2005). Approximate floor acceleration demands in multi-story buildings. II: Applications. Journal of Structural Engineering.
[6] Ghahari, S. F., Abazarsa, F., & Taciroglu, E. (2015). Efficient model updating of a multi-story frame and its foundation stiffness from earthquake records using a Timoshenko beam model. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, 1–24.
[7] Ebrahimian, M., & Todorovska, M. I. (2013). Wave propagation in a Timoshenko beam building model. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 140(5), 4014018.
[8] Ebrahimian, M., Rahmani, M., & Todorovska, M. I. (2014). Nonparametric estimation of wave dispersion in high-rise buildings by seismic interferometry. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 43(15), 2361–2375.
[9] Yuen, K.-V. (2010). Bayesian methods for structural dynamics and civil engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
[10] Timoshenko, S. P. (1921). On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41(245), 744–746.
[11] Levinson, M., & Cooke, D. W. (1982). On the two frequency spectra of Timoshenko beams. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 84(3), 319–326.
[12] Abbas, B. a. H. (1984). Vibrations of Timoshenko beams with elastically restrained ends. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 97(4), 541–548.
[13] Aristizabal-Ochoa, J. D. (2004). Timoshenko beam-column with generalized end conditions and non-classical modes of vibration of shear beams. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(10), 1151–1159.
[14] Dong, S. B., Alpdogan, C., & Taciroglu, E. (2010). Much ado about shear correction factors in Timoshenko beam theory. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 47(13), 1651–1665.
[15] Taciroglu, E., Ghahari, S. F., & Abazarsa, F. (2017). Efficient model updating of a multi-story frame and its foundation stiffness from earthquake records using a Timoshenko beam model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, 25–35.
[16] Ertugrul Taciroglu, Mehmet Çelebi, S. Farid Ghahari, F. A. (2017). An investigation of soil-structure interaction effects observed at the MIT green building. The Professional Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
[17] Yuen, K. V., Beck, J. L., & Katafygiotis, L. S. (2006). Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 13(1), 91–107.
[18] Katafygiotis, L. S., & Yuen, K. V. (2001). Bayesian spectral density approach for modal updating using ambient data. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(8), 1103–1123.
[19] Yuen, K. V., Beck, J. L., & Katafygiotis, L. S. (2002). Probabilistic approach for modal identification using non-stationary noisy response measurements only. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(4), 1007–1023.
[20] Yuen, K. V., & Katafygiotis, L. S. (2001). Bayesian time-domain approach for modal updating using ambient data. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 16(3), 219–231.
[21] Yuen, K.-V., & Katafygiotis, L. S. (2002). Bayesian modal updating using complete input and incomplete response noisy measurements. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(3), 340–350.
[22] Shirzad-Ghaleroudkhani, N., Mahsuli, M., Ghahari, S. F., & Taciroglu, E. (2017). Bayesian identification of soil - foundation stiffness of building structures. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, In Press.
[23] Huang, T. C. (1961). The effect of rotatory inertia and of shear deformation on the frequency and normal mode equations of uniform beams with simple end conditions. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 28(4), 579–584.
[24] Cheng, M. H., & Heaton, T. H. (2015). Simulating building motions using ratios of the building’s natural frequencies and a Timoshenko beam model. Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 403–420.
[25] Han, S. M., Benaroya, H., & Wei, T. (1999). Dynamics of transversely vibrating beams using four engineering theories. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 225(5), 935–988.
[26] Paolo, G., Reinhorn, A. M., & Bruneau, M. (2010). Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Engineering Structures, 32(11), 3639–3649.
[27] U. B. Code. (1997). Uniform Building Code. Whittier, CA: International conference of building officials.
[28] International Code Council. (2012). International Building Code. Washington D. C.
[29] CA: Computers and structures, Inc. (2013). ETABS, Berkley: August 2013.
[30] Byrd, R. H., Gilbert, J. C., & Nocedal, J. (2000). A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming, 89(1), 149–185.
[31] Ugray, Z., Lasdon, L., Plummer, J., Glover, F., Kelly, J., & Martí, R. (2007). Scatter search and local NLP solvers: A multistart framework for global optimization. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 19(3), 328–340.
[32] Mathworks. (2013). MATLAB, The language of technical computing.