بررسی عملکرد سیستم های دوگانه ی قاب خمشی با دیوار برشی فولادی تحت اثر انفجار

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه عمران، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند،ایران

2 گروه عمران، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران

3 گروه عمران، دانشکده مهندسی شهید نیکبخت، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

4 گروه عمران، واحد گرمسار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، گرمسار، ایران

5 گروه عمران، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

چکیده

امروزه با گسترش حملات تروریستی در بسیاری از نقاط جهان، رویکرد طراحی سازه‌ها در مقابل بارگذاری‌های غیرمتعارف ازجمله انفجار نیز مورد توجه آیین‌نامه‌های طراحی قرارگرفته است. در سال‌های اخیر، از سیستم‌ دوگانه‌ی قاب خمشی با دیوار برشی فولادی در طراحی سازه‌ها به‌عنوان سیستم باربر مقاوم در برابر بارهای جانبی استفاده شده و مزایای متعددی مانند هزینه‌ی ساخت کم، نصب سریع، پتانسیل جذب انرژی بالا، شکل‌پذیری مناسب، افزایش سختی و کاهش تغییرمکان، دیوار برشی فولادی را به عنوان یک سیستم مناسب جهت مقاوم‌سازی سازه‌های موجود تبدیل کرده است بنابراین مطالعه‌ی رفتار این سیستم در برابر بارهای انفجاری نیز ضروری به نظر می‌رسد. در این تحقیق، سازه‌های فولادی قاب‌ خمشی با و بدون دیوار برشی فولادی (3، 6 و 9 طبقه) به‌صورت سه ‌بعدی در نرم‌افزار ETABS بر اساس ضوابط آئین‌نامه‌ای طراحی و سپس قاب دو بعدی کناری استخراج و تحلیل دینامیکی غیرخطی تاریخچه زمانی تحت بارگذاری انفجاری در دو سناریو داخل و خارج صفحه‌ی قاب در نرم‌افزار اجزا محدودی ABAQUS انجام شده و در نهایت امکان رخداد فروریزش پیش‌رونده بررسی و مقایسه شده است. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که در سناریوی بارگذاری انفجار داخل صفحه‌ی قاب، سیستم دوگانه‌ی دیوار برشی فولادی عملکرد مناسبی در مقایسه با سیستم قاب خمشی داشته و باعث محدود شدن فروریزش پیش‌رونده گردیده درحالی‌که در سناریوی بارگذاری انفجار خارج از صفحه‌ی قاب به دلیل انتشار موج انفجار بر دیوار برشی فولادی، سیستم قاب خمشی عملکرد بهتری داشته است. همچنین بر اساس مقایسه‌ی شاخص تنومندی (RI) در سناریوهای بارگذاری انفجار داخل و خارج قاب به ترتیب سازه‌های دارای دیوار برشی فولادی و قاب خمشی عملکرد مطلوب‌تری داشته‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation the performance of Dual Systems Moment-Resisting Frame with Steel Plate Shear Wall Subjected to Blast Loading

نویسندگان [English]

  • Baharan Khizab 1
  • Abbasali Sadeghi 2
  • Seyede Vahide Hashemi 3
  • Kourosh Mehdizadeh 4
  • HamidReza Nasseri 5
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering (Shahid Nikbakht), University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
4 Department of Civil Engineering, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran
5 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran
چکیده [English]

Nowadays, with the spread of terrorist attacks in many parts of the world, the design approach to abnormal loadings, such as a blast load, has also become noted of design regulations. In recent years, the dual moment-resisting frame system with steel plate shear wall has been used in the design of structures as a load-bearing system and has several advantages such as low construction cost, rapid installation, high energy absorption potential, suitable ductility, Increasing stiffness and decreasing displacement have made the steel plate shear wall as a proper system for retrofing existing structures, so it is necessary to investigate the behavior of this system against blast loads. In this study, moment-resisting frame structures with and without steel plate shear wall (3, 6 and 9-story) were designed in 3D by ETABS software based on code guidelines and then two-dimensional side frame was extracted in order to be analyzed under the effect of blast loading in 2 scenario such as in-plane and out-plane frame with finite element ABAQUS software and finally the possibility of occurrence progressive collapse were investigated and compared. The results of the present study showed that steel plate shear wall dual system has a suitable performance in comparison to moment-resisting frame in the scenario "in-plane blast loading". It restricted the progressive collapse potential while in the scenario "out-of-plane blast loading" because of the blast load wave propagation in steel plate shear wall, then the moment frame has a better performance. Also, according to the Robustness Index (RI) comparison, with regarding to the in-plane and out-of-plane blast loadings, the steel plate shear wall and moment-resisting frame structures had the best performance, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Blast Loading
  • Dual System
  • Steel Moment-Resisting Frame
  • Steel Plate Shear Wall
  • Progressive Collapse
  • ABAQUS Software
[1] Osteraas, J. D. (2006). Murrah building bombing revisited: A qualitative assessment of blast damage and collapse patterns. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 20(4), 330-335.
[2] GSA, US. (2003). Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC.
[3] DoD, (2005). U. S. Unified facilities criteria: design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. UFC 4-023-03. United States Department of Defense, Washington, DC, USA.
[4] National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Tower, NCSTAR 1. Gaithersburg: NIST, (2005). NCSTAR, N. Final report on the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers. Principal Findings.
[5] American Society of Civil Engineers. ASCE 7-05. (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. New York.
[6] Ferahian, R. H. (1972). Buildings: Design for Prevention of Progressive Collapse. Civil Engineering- ASCE. Pages 66-69.
[7] Astaneh-Asl, A., Jones, B, Zhao, Y., and Hwa, R. (2002). Progressive Collapse Resistance of Steel Building Floors. Report number: CB/CEE-STEEL-03, University of California at Berkeley.
[8] Astaneh-Asl, A. (2003). Progressive Collapse Prevention in New and Existing Buildings. Proceedings, 9th Arab Structural Engineering Conference, United Arab Emirates.
[9] Kaewkulchai, G. & Williamson, EB. (2003). Dynamic behavior of planar frames during progressive collapse. In: 16th ASCE engineering mechanics conference.
[10] Khandelwal, K, El-Tawil, S & Sadek, F. (2009). Progressive Collapse Analysis of Seismically Designed Steel Braced Frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(3) 699-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.007
[11] Laskar, A., Gu, H., Mo, Y. L., & Song, G. (2009). Progressive collapse of a two-story reinforced concrete frame with embedded smart aggregates. Smart Materials and Structures, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/18/7/075001
[12] Silva, P. F., & Lu, B. (2009). Blast resistance capacity of reinforced concrete slabs. Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(6) 708-716. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000011
[13] Warn, G. P., & Bruneau, M. (2009). Blast resistance of steel plate shear walls designed for seismic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(10), 1222-1230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000055
[14] Park, J. & Kim, J. (2010). Fragility analysis of steel moment frames with various seismic connections subjected to sudden loss of a column, Engineering Structures, 32(6) 1547-1555.
[15] Szyniszewski, S. (2009). Probabilistic Approach to Progressive Collapse Prevention. Physics Based Simulations. Structures Congress: ASCE, 2836-2843. https://doi.org/10.1061/41031(341)310
[16] Jayasooriya R, Thambiratnam D.P, Perera N. J, & Kosse V, (2011). Blast and residual capacity analysis of reinforced concrete framed buildings. Engineering structures, 33(12), 3483-3495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.011
[17] Tavakoli, H. & Kiakojouri, F. (2012). Influence of sudden column loss on dynamic response of steel moment frames under blast loading. International Journal of Engineering Transactions B: Applications. 26(2) 197-206. http://www.ije.ir/Vol26/No2/B/10-1367.pdf
[18] Hadianfard, M. A., & Farahani, A. (2012). On the effect of steel columns cross sectional properties on the behaviours when subjected to blast loading. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 44(4) 449-463. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.44.4.449
[19] Hadianfard, M. A., & Farahani, A. (2016). Investigation of Steel Column Behavior with Different Cross Section under Blast Loading. Modares Civil Engineering Journal (M.C.E.J), 16(4) 265-278. http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-16-10032-en.html
[20] Hao, H., Li, Z. X., & Shi, Y. (2015). Reliability analysis of RC columns and frame with FRP strengthening subjected to explosive loads. Journal of Performance of constructed Facilities, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000748
[21] Moghimi, H, & Driver, R,G. (2015). Performance assessment of steel plate shear walls under accidental blast loads, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 106 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.11.010
[22] Y.A. Al-Salloum, H. Abbas, T.H. Almusallam, T. Ngo, & P. Mendis, (2017). Progressive collapse analysis of a typical RC high-rise tower, Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 29(40) 313-320.
[23] Ibrahim, Y. E., Ismail, M. A., & Nabil, M. (2017). Response of reinforced concrete frame structures under blast loading. Procedia Engineering, 171, 890-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.384
[24] Kumar, A. & Matsagar, V. (2018). Blast Fragility and Sensitivity Analyses of Steel Moment Frames with Plan Irregularities. International Journal of Steel Structures, 18(5) 1684–1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0077-z (In Persian).
[25] Malekpour, S. & Moarefzadeh, M. (2018). Stochastic Representation of Interior Explosion Damages to Reinforced Concrete Structures. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Doi: 10.22065/jsce.2018.127809.1534 (In Persian).
[26] Khorshidi Mianaei, H., Mirtaheri, M., & Rezaei Barounaghi, H. (2019). Investigation of the effect of thickness and type of steel on the behavior of steel plate shear wall under blast loads. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Doi: 10.22065/jsce.2019.144313.1637
[27] Mehdizadeh, K., Karamodin, A. & Sadeghi, A. (2020). Progressive Sidesway Collapse Analysis of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Under Earthquake Excitations. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Enghttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00374-0
[28] INBC. (2013). Design and Construction of Steel Structures. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Iranian National Building Code, Part 10. (In Persian).
[29] INBC. (2013). Design Loads for Buildings. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Iranian National Building Code, Part 6. (In Persian).
[30] BHRC. (2014). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. Tehran: Building and Housing Research Centre, Standard No. 2800. (In Persian).
[31] ETABS theory manual. (2017), Version 9.2.0. Copyright Computers and Structures, Inc.
[32] ABAQUS, Abaqus/standard, (2012) version 6.11, ABAQUS, Inc., Pawtucket, R.I.
[33] American Institute of Steel Construction, Design Guide 20: Steel Plate Shear Walls, (2006).
[34] R. Jalali Larijani, (2013). Progressive Collapse Analysis of Two Existing Steel Buildings Using Linear Static Procedure, Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 48(2) 207-220. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.48.2.207
[35] Choi, I.R.  & Park, H.G. (2008). Ductility and Energy Dissipation Capacity of Shear-Dominated Steel Plate Walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(9). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:9(1495)
[36] Langdon, G.S.  Lee, W.C. & Louca, L.A. (2015). The influence of material type on the response of plates to air-blast loading, International Journal of Impact Engineering. 78. 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.12.008
[37] Byfield, M. P. (2006). Behavior and Design of Commertial MultiStory Buildings Subjected to Blast, Journal of performance of constructed faculititties, ASCE. 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(324)
[38] US. Department of Defense (2008). Primer to Design Safe School Projects in Case of Terrorist Attacks. FEMA 428.
[39] Uwe Starossek, Marco Haberland, (2006), Evaluating Measures of Structural Robustness, ASCE Structures Congress, Austin, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.1061/41031(341)194
[40] Gholampoor dahaki, S., Vaseghi Amiri, J., Naseri, A., Rezayi, S. (2018). Effect of eliminating the column on progressive collapse on seismic performance in dual steel structures. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 5(3), 5-27. Doi: 10.22065/jsce.2017.73072.1055 (In Persian).
[41] Abdollahzadeh G.R., Faghihmaleki H., (2017). A method to evaluate the risk-based robustness index in blast-influenced structures. International Journal of Earthquakes and Structures, 12(1): 47-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.047
[42] Abdollahzadeh G.R., Faghihmaleki H. (2017). Seismic-explosion risk-based robustness index of structures. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 26(4): 523-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789516651919
[43] Faghihmaleki, H. (2017). Assessment of Robustness Index and Progressive Collapse in the RC Frame with Shear Wall Structure under Blast Loading. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 4(1): 59-66. https://dx.doi.org/10.22105/jarie.2017.49601