بررسی استحکام کششی وصله های جوشی میلگرد های فولادی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد سازه، گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی متالورژی و مواد، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

4 دانشجوی دکتری سازه، گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رودهن، ایران

چکیده

با توجه به نیاز روز افزون به استفاده از میلگرد در ساختمان سازی، تلاش های زیادی برای بهینه کردن مصرف آن انجام شده است. یکی از روش های کاهش مصرف میلگرد استفاده از وصله جوشی به جای وصله پوششی است. با وجود این، در آیین نامه بتن ایران تنها به کلیات وصله جوشی اشاره شده و هیچ ضابطه ای برای نحوه انجام وصله ارائه نشده است. از این رو، هدف از این تحقیق بررسی مقاومت کششی میلگردهای دارای وصله جوشی با پیکربندی های مختلف است. برای این منظور میلگردهای با قطر 10، 14، 18، 22 و 25 با انواع الگوهای هم پوشانی منقطع و پیوسته توسط جوش کاری با الکترود E6013 به یکدیگر متصل شدند. سپس مقاومت کششی میلگردهای متصل شده توسط آزمایش کشش به دست آمد. در ادامه به کمک نرم افزار آباکوس و با روش تولد و مرگ المان، انواع الگوهای وصله، مدل شده و نتایج به دست آمده با نتایج آزمایشگاهی مقایسه شد. نتایج حاکی از آن است که وصله جوشی بهینه،جوش منقطع با طول جوش 5d می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of Tensile Strength of Welded Splices of Steel Bars

نویسندگان [English]

  • Pouyan Ashrafpour 1
  • Mohsen Adabi 2
  • Ehsan Darvishan 3
  • Siyavash Moeini 4
1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Roudehen branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
4 Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
چکیده [English]

Due to the increasing need to use rebar in construction, many efforts have been made to optimize its use. One way to reduce rebar usage is to use welded splice instead of overlap splice. However, the Iranian Concrete Code only refers to the welded splice generalities and there are no rules on how to splice. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the tensile strength of welded splice bars with different configurations. For this purpose, rebars with diameters of 10, 14, 18, 22 and 25 were connected to each other by a variety of discontinuous and continuous overlap patterns by welding with the E6013 electrode. Then the tensile strength of the connected rebars was obtained by tensile test. Then, with Abaqus software and the birth and death method, a variety of splice patterns were modeled and the results were compared with laboratory results. The results show that the optimum welded splice is the model with discontinuous weld with a weld length of 5d.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Overlap joint
  • Welded joint
  • Discontinuous welding
  • Modeling
  • Abaqus
[1] Ghorbani, A. and Bakhtiari, V. and Sedighmofrad, S. and  Goudarzi, M. (2015). AHP modeling to investigate three types of rebar connections: overlap, coupling and forging.Tehran: Iran Institute of Seismic Rehabilitation and Improvement
[2] Iranian Concrete Regulations. (2004). Office of Technical Affairs and Standards Development.
[3] Kheyroddin, A. and Famili, H. and Shirinsokhan, H. and Delnavaz, M. (2017). Introduction of new methods of reinforcing splices in reinforced concrete structures.Tehran: Journal of Iranian Concrete Association.
[4] National Building Regulations No. 9. (2013)Design and Implementation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings.Tehran: National Building Regulations Office, Fourth Edition, Iran Development Publication.
[5] Barzegarfahliani, B. (2015). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Forging Welding.Tehran:Iran Institute of Seismic Rehabilitation and Improvement.
[6] Bodaghi, F. (2015). Investigation of the Replacement of Overlap SplicesWith Welding Splices. Tehran:Seismic Rehabilitation and Improvement Institute.
[7] Issa, C.A. and Nasr, A. (2006). An Experimental Study of Welded Splices of Reinforcing Bars. Building and environment, 41(10), 1394-1405.
[8] Moustafa, T. and Khalifa, W. and El-Koussy, M. and El-Reheem, N. A. (2016). Optimizing the Welding Parameters of Reinforcing Steel Bars. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 41(5), 1699-1711.
[9] Metal Arc Welding of Steel for Concrete Reinforcement. (1989). CEN247/BS 7123.
[10]Welding of Reinforcing bars in reinforced concrete structures. (1989).W186-M 1990.
[11] Tian, Y. and Feng, P. and Zhou, Z. H. and Ye, L.P. and Wan, B. L. (2012). Test on Hybrid Connection for Steel Bars in Concrete. Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech Publications.(Vol. 166, pp. 215-218).
[12] Ahmed, Gh. (2016). Mechanical Properties for Splices of Welded Reinforcing Steel Bars. ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 27(6), 99-112.
[13]Henin, E. and Morcous, G. (2015). Reinforcing bar splice sleeve for precast concrete constructions.Engineering Structures 83, 154-162.
[14]Rybicki, E.F. and Schmuser, D.W. and Stonesifer, R.B. and Groom, J.J. and Mishler, H.W. (1978).A FiniteElement Method for Residual Stress in Girth-Butt Welded Pipes. ASME, Journal of PressureVessel Technology, Vol. 100, pp. 256-262.
[15]Andersson, B. A. (1978).Thermal Stresses in a Submerged-Arc Welded Joint Considering PhaseTransformations. Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 100, pp. 356-362.
[16] Michaleris, P. (1996). Residual Stress Distributions for Multi-pass Welds in Pressure Vessel andPiping Components, In Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference,Montreal, Canada, Vol. 327, pp. 17–27.
[17]Qingren, X. and Yaorong, F. and Chunyong, H.(2002).The Measurement and Control of Residual Stressin Spiral Sub-merged Arc Welded Pipe.Forth International pipeline conference, Alberta,Canada, pp. 615–622.
[18]Brickstad, B. and Josefson, B.L.(1998). A Parametric Study of Residual Stresses in Multi-pass Butt-Welded Stainless Steel Pipes.International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 75,pp. 11-25.
[19]Yajiang, L. and Juan, W. and Maoai, C. and Xiaoqin, S. (2004).Finite Element Analysis of Residual Stress inthe Welded Zone of a High Strength Steel.Bulletin of Materials Science, Vol. 27(2), pp. 127-132.
[20]Kermanpur, A. and Shamanian, M. and Esfahani Yeganeh, V.(2008). Three-Dimensional ThermalSimulation and Experimental Investigation of GTAW Circumferentially Butt-Welded Incoloy800 Pipes.Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 99, pp. 295-303.
[21]Mashayekhi, M. and Hedayati, H. (2011). Effect of Welding Sequence and Hydrotest Process on Welding Residual Stresses in Stainless Steel SUS304 Pipes. Journal of Applied and Computational Sciences in Mechanics, 17-34.
[22]Hibbitt, Karlsson, Sorensen, Inc.(2004). ABAQUS/standard user’s manual, v. 6.8. Pawtucket, RhodeIsland.
[23]Goldak, J. and Chakravarti, A. and Bibby, M. (1984). A New Finite Element Model for Welding Heat Sources.Metallurgical transactions B, 15(2), 299-305.
[24] ROY R. CRAIG, JR. Mechanics of Materials,Third Edition,JOHN WILEY & SONS, 42.