Structural behaviour of concrete poles used in electric's power distribution network

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 MSc, Civil Engineering Department, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Based on a preliminary study on regional electric companies, it is shown that there is no precise structural design on the concrete poles. This leads to uneconomical and overestimated networks’ components. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate the lateral performance of the concrete poles which are employed in electric’s power distribution network. This paper presents a numerical study on structural performance of 12 m concrete poles used in electric’s power distribution network using Abaqus software. A sensitivity study for mesh size is carried out and concrete damaged plasticity has been employed. The results show that relatively coarse mesh (average) in damaged concrete method gives more reliable result. Some experimental tests based on the Iranian standards were performed in order to make a bench mark for numerical output. Comparison between numerical and experimental results indicates a good agreement between the results. The outcomes also suggest that while the applied lateral load is less than around 400 kg which is assumed as the nominal resistance of the pole, no transverse crack occurs. Based on both experimental and numerical results, one or two transverse cracks are reported when the applied force reaches up to 600 kg. The rate of cracks is amplified by increasing the applied force; and finally, the pole would lose its capacity when the load rises much more than 1200 kg. The study also shows that the poles are very weak when the load direction changes. Also, it can be concluded that the final strength of the pole is higher than what the standards recommend. Finally, seismic behavior factor of the poles around both main axes are evaluated. The estimated seismic resistance factor for the concrete poles indicates that the prescribed R factor for such structure is relatively low; and can be improved at least 20%.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Iran Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Company (Tavanir). (2011). Technical Requirements and Evaluation Criteria for Square Reinforced Concrete Poles. Tehran: Tavanir, 39.
[2] Mosavi, M. et al. (2013). Determination of Parameters of Plastic Damage Model for Concrete in Numerical Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Frame. In: 7th national congress on civil engineering. Zahedan, Iran.
[3] Kmiecik, P. and Kaminski, M. (2011). Modelling of Reinforced Concrete Structures and Composite Structures with Concrete Strength Degradation Taken into Consideration. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 11(3), 623-636.
[4] Ahani, A. et al. (2012). Comparison between the Concrete Damage Plasticity and Concrete Smeared Crack in the modelling of reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill. In: 2nd national conference on Structure, Earthquake and Geotechnics. Babolsar, Iran.
[5] Geological Society Publications Online. Available at: http://sp.lyellcollection.org/content/282/1/457/F2.expansion [Accessed 23 Des. 2016].
[6] Mameghani, M. et al. (2013). Study of Plasticity Parameters in Numerical Cracks Concrete Modeling. In: International Conference on civil engineering, architecture & urban sustainable development. Tabriz, Iran.
[7] Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. (2012). Abaqus Theory and User’s Manual.
[8] Simulia. Concrete Damaged Plasticity. Abaqus Analysis User's Manual.
[9] Iran National Building Regulations. (2014). Design and construction of reinforced concrete (No. 9).
[10] Shim, W. and Vecchio, F.J. (2004). Experimental and Analytical Examination of Classic Concrete Beam Tests. Structural engineering, 130, 460-469.
[11] Permanent Committee for Revising the Iranian Code of practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Building., (2015). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant Design of Building (Standard No. 2800).
[12] Zeynalian, M. and H. R. Ronagh. (2012). A Numerical Study on Seismic Performance of Strap-Braced Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls. Thin-Walled Structures, 60, 229-23.
[13] FEMA-450 (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures - Part 1 Provisions. USA: Building Seismic Safety Council.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 November 2016
  • Revise Date: 16 December 2016
  • Accept Date: 09 January 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics